Mnyb wrote:
> Idea ? Let some music interested forum members pick thier stuff .
That is an excellent idea, is there enough life in the squeezebox team
(I wonder: how is there still any kind of squeezebox team?) to do the
tiny bit of validation and putting it up there required?
bklaas wrote:
> Greetings Zombie Squeezebox Owners,
>
> Several years post-squeezebox "death", my 10 squeezeboxes are all
> chugging along nicely, thankyouverymuch.
>
> Never give up! Never surrender!
KABOOM! Just thinking today how my 11 (c'mon!) squeezeboxes are still
giving my great joy and
There are regularly sellers on ebay selling psu's they claim to be
compatible with the boom, but no real indication of quality.
Alternative is often 12v psus manufactured by DVE come up second hand
quite often. Usually just for a couple of quid + postage. These seem to
always have the right sized
ModelCitizen wrote:
> Logitech bit off more than they could chew. They're basically a pile 'em
> high, sell 'em cheap box maker. They bought a geeky, buggy software
> based product which they wanted to quickly turn mass market. They got in
> over their heads. They missed huge potential even thou
toby10 wrote:
> They can't operate as both a SB Radio and a UE Radio by a simple menu
> function.
> It's one or the other requiring a completely separate firmware (OS) for
> each type, SB or UE.
> Not that many would not like your idea, as has been suggested before.
> But it's just not possi
IMHO that doesn't really mean anything, aside from there'll be
discussion on the forum, and Logitech will execute any duties required
of them in accordance with sales law in whatever countries. It's the
same as all the other announcements so far imho (i.e. "rest assured" you
can still use the last
If you bought a Radio, got it out of the box, and it JUST connected to
MSB, would that not be almost the same as UE - except that maybe UE has
some different user interface/is a bit more user friendly?
Then there is a menu option somewhere to enable the full squeezebox
experience. Those people th
ModelCitizen wrote:
> I think you'll find that most here think that Logitech's decision to
> make the functionality of their players so heavily dependent on MSB was
> an atrocious one.
>
> At the time they made it (during development of the duet, radio?) All
> the beta testers advised against it
TBH it was a comment on the support operation rather than the supposed
unavailability of the standalone receiver, or the reason why they won't
RMA separate bits ;)
--
tin
tin's Profile: http://forums.slimd
t "the receiver of the Logitech Squeezebox Duet
is not available as a stand alone accessory for replacement or for
sale". ;)
Communication, they have heard of it
--
tin
tin's Profile: http://for
Also try changing the channel your wireless network works on, reduces
the interference in some cases.
--
tin
tin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7125
View this thread:
11 matches
Mail list logo
