Re: [slim] Airport Express and SB3?

2007-05-05 Thread Chip Hart
jtc wrote: > Good point - maybe they're on the same channel. DIdn't realise that was > important (as one is repeating the other). Will try changing it. I'll also add that Airports don't play well with non-Mac devices as a rule - ESPECIALLY when trying to manage multiple spots, as

Re: [slim] Airport Express and SB3?

2007-05-03 Thread jtc
Good point - maybe they're on the same channel. DIdn't realise that was important (as one is repeating the other). Will try changing it. -- jtc jtc's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11230 View th

Re: [slim] Airport Express and SB3?

2007-05-03 Thread Eric Seaberg
If your wireless strength is that low, are you sure you're not reading the Extreme Base that's further away? Are the channels of the two too close together? You should have at least 2-channels of separation if not 3 between the two wireless devices. -- Eric Seaberg Eric Seaberg - San Diego [

Re: [slim] Airport Express and SB3?

2007-05-03 Thread jtc
Thanks. The point is that the Airport Express isn't operating as a router - it connects wirelessly to an AIrport Extreme Base STation (which then connects to the SLimServer machine via wires/switch). So, it's a matter of whether I'd be better off just having one wireless stage or two... -- jt

Re: [slim] Airport Express and SB3?

2007-05-03 Thread aubuti
Wired is generally better, as it's not susceptible to interference from microwave ovens, cordless phones, your neighbor's wireless network, or other sources. -- aubuti aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member

[slim] Airport Express and SB3?

2007-05-03 Thread jtc
I have an Airport Express which is only a few inches from my SB3. Which would be better to use between the devices: the wireless or the wired connection? Or doesn't it matter. I am asking as my signal strength, despite the WDS being set properly, reads only as 50-55% which makes me wonder how g