JJZolx;270800 Wrote:
> This isn't necessary in the tracknumber tags - in fact I generally force
> tracknumbers to not have the leading zero. However, it's a very good
> idea in file names so that simply listing or browsing the folder in
> your operating system will show the tracks in the origina
We're not going to workaround an already-fixed MySQL bug.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43571
_
GoodVibrations;270299 Wrote:
> Just noticed that for some reason I haven't gotten "0" in front off all
> the single digit tracks on the album. I'll fix that.
This isn't necessary in the tracknumber tags - in fact I generally
force tracknumbers to not have the leading zero. However, it's a very
On 17-Feb-08, at 2:43 AM, max.spicer wrote:
>
> GoodVibrations;270293 Wrote:
>> I have a very mysterious problem with the sortorder when browsing
>> albums
>> by name.
>
> Sounds like you've hit the same problem I'm getting. No solution as
> yet, I'm afraid. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_b
GoodVibrations;270408 Wrote:
>
> When I move my music to it, I think I'll pull MySQL from sid
> (5.0.51a-1) to see if that makes a difference, sorting wise.
Well, not:
"Noted in 5.0.52, 5.1.23, 6.0.4 changelogs.
Under certain conditions, the presence of a GROUP BY clause could
cause an ORDER B
Commented on the bugreport.
Well my genre sort is also wrong. Never use it, so I hadn't noticed it
before.
Luckily my artist sort works. For now... ;-)
Looks like we all 3 use Debian/Debian-based distros. A clue perhaps?
I'm building a new pc next week, for Squeeze.
When I move my music to it,
I think a workaround in SqueezeCenter is necessary here. It is a major
pain to browse the music library with artist/album/genres appearing
randomly.
B.
--
bhaagensen
bhaagensen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/mem
I'm fine with that.
Thank you for your answers.
I can then go on with the ripping and tagging, knowing that that's not
the cause of the strange sorting, and hope that the bugs will be fixed
in a later update.
--
GoodVibrations
--
max.spicer;270304 Wrote:
> Sounds like you've hit the same problem I'm getting. No solution as
> yet, I'm afraid. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7035
>
> Max
I think this is actually a MySQL bug.
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=32202
Max
--
max.spicer
What do we want? Smo
GoodVibrations;270293 Wrote:
> I have a very mysterious problem with the sortorder when browsing albums
> by name.
Sounds like you've hit the same problem I'm getting. No solution as
yet, I'm afraid. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7035
Max
--
max.spicer
What do we want? Smoo
Just noticed that for some reason I haven't gotten "0" in front off all
the single digit tracks on the album. I'll fix that.
But still, the 4 tracks listed as album no. 423 are tracks no. 1, 10,
13 & 17.
So that's shouldn't be the problem with the album in question.
And it still dosen't answer
Hi,
I'm pretty new to SS.
I'm in the process of ripping my 2500 cd's.
Yesterday I finally managed to get compilations to work.
But I have a very mysterious problem with the sortorder when browsing
albums by name.
I can't see any kind of system to it.
SlimServer Version: 6.5.4 - 12568 - Debian
12 matches
Mail list logo
