Re: [slim] At the risk of chawing off Slim Devices...

2007-11-06 Thread slimmert
Have you seen this? http://www.brendandawes.com/news/browsebox-chumby-meets-squeezebox -- slimmert slimmert's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7104 View this thread:

Re: [slim] At the risk of chawing off Slim Devices...

2007-11-06 Thread radish
Full page video backgrounduggghhh...*shudder* I feel I need to go shower... -- radish radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread:

Re: [slim] At the risk of chawing off Slim Devices...

2007-10-29 Thread cepstein
JimC;235431 Wrote: Chumby may not have the required Java or CODEC support -- not really sure on that one. The Chumby can definitely play the /stream.mp3 URL and runs Flash apps, so in theory the SlimFX skin might work when combined with running btplay (the app on the Chumby that plays MP3

Re: [slim] At the risk of chawing off Slim Devices...

2007-10-16 Thread kib
Thanks for your thoughts Jim ! I was just thinking in terms of low cost/low power consumption alternate devices for controlling a SlimServer. Also nice to hear Slim folk have a high tolerance for discomfort (g) -- kib

[slim] At the risk of chawing off Slim Devices...

2007-10-15 Thread kib
Has anyone looked into porting SoftSqueeze over to the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) box or a Chumby? Doable? -- kib kib's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13570 View this thread:

Re: [slim] At the risk of chawing off Slim Devices...

2007-10-15 Thread JimC
kib;235429 Wrote: Has anyone looked into porting SoftSqueeze over to the OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) box or a Chumby? Doable? As far as I know, no one here would be chawed off (is that the correct way to use chawing in the past tense?). The markets targeted by the OLPC aren't likely to be