Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-28 Thread Soulkeeper
True. Cable length is an important factor. I used to make my CAT5 cables terribly terribly wrong, but didn't even notice until I once mounted one in a mechanical workshop (probably full of noise) and couldn't make it work. :P That's when I learned you have to take the twisted pairs into account.

Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-27 Thread Mark Miksis
agillis;541150 Wrote: > Your better off going with wireless then trying to run Gig over Cat3. In this case, there's no point in trying to use GE anyway since none of the SB products support it. You may get away with 10/100 especially if your runs are much shorter than the 90m allowed for CAT5.

Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-27 Thread agillis
ajkidle;541117 Wrote: > So the router will throttle the speed automatically based on quality of > the connection? It might but your audio quality will definably suffer. Expect dropouts as your router tries to make everything work. Your better off going with wireless then trying to run Gig over

Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-27 Thread ajkidle
So the router will throttle the speed automatically based on quality of the connection? -- ajkidle 2x SBR, SB3, Boom, Radio, iPeng ajkidle's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18929 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-27 Thread SuperQ
I have had situations where we had to run networking over cat3 due to very old buildings. Most modern 100mbps PHYs are good enough that it should work reasonably well. Gigabit on the other hand is not going to work well. It might get a link but you will get mostly packet loss. You will get som

Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-27 Thread Soulkeeper
That's interesting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_3_cable In theory you can get reliable 100 Mbps from Cat3, but that probably requires some special hardware in each end of the cable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100BASE-T4#100BASE-T4 -- Soulkeeper ---

Re: [slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-26 Thread JJZolx
ajkidle;540714 Wrote: > What I originally believed to be Cat-5 running through my house has > turned out to be Cat-3. I had hoped to repurpose the phone system (the > Cat-3 wiring) to provide ethernet throughout the house. Are my hopes > dashed? Wikipedia says Cat-3 is for 10Mbps, doesn't soun

[slim] Cat-3 Cables

2010-04-26 Thread ajkidle
What I originally believed to be Cat-5 running through my house has turned out to be Cat-3. I had hoped to repurpose the phone system (the Cat-3 wiring) to provide ethernet throughout the house. Are my hopes dashed? Wikipedia says Cat-3 is for 10Mbps, doesn't sound like a very good idea to plug