Mark Lanctot wrote:
> peter;363991 Wrote:
>
>> I want N because my laptop is N and now connected at 130 Mbit.
>>
>
> This is great for a laptop, but what would an audio player do with all
> that bandwidth?
>
One, not much. But several at the same time...
Or an audio player sharing its
peter;363991 Wrote:
> I want N because my laptop is N and now connected at 130 Mbit.
This is great for a laptop, but what would an audio player do with all
that bandwidth?
> Also my upstairs controller seems to have a slightly better connection.
Good, but this isn't due to the controller's wir
Mark Lanctot wrote:
> DeVerm;362391 Wrote:
>
>> The only reason I can think of would be so that the SB uses less time on
>> the air, leaving more bandwidth for other users of the router.
>>
>
> OK, that's a good one, but a lot of people want 'n' just because it's
> the latest and greatest.
DeVerm;362391 Wrote:
> The only reason I can think of would be so that the SB uses less time on
> the air, leaving more bandwidth for other users of the router.
OK, that's a good one, but a lot of people want 'n' just because it's
the latest and greatest.
n's increased bandwidth isn't useful on
DIR-655 has also worked great for me, though I did replace one of the 3
antennas with a directional unit due to long distance and many walls.
That actually is one of the nice things about the DLink units, that it
is easy to replace their low gain omnidirectional antennas. Our access
point sits a
Mark Lanctot;362219 Wrote:
> Why?
The only reason I can think of would be so that the SB uses less time
on the air, leaving more bandwidth for other users of the router. When
one disables support for 11 Mbps "b" devices on the router it shouldn't
be an issue until you get a lot of SB's playing a
mikel51;362153 Wrote:
> now if only our squeezeboxes could be upgraded to wireless-N.
Why?
(extra text to avoid overly short post)
--
Mark Lanctot
Current: SB2, Transporter, Boom (PQP3 - late beta)
Stored: Boom (PQP1 - early beta), SBC (beta - no battery)
Sold: SB3, Duet
---
I'm also a happy DIR655 usersigh, now if only our squeezeboxes could
be upgraded to wireless-N.
--
mikel51
mikel51's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16688
View this thread: http://forums.slimde
+1 DIR-655 has worked 100% with Duet, Controller and SB3 for me as well
--
petemac
petemac's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18630
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=5
coma wrote:
> Do those of you using either the D-Link DIR-655 or the Airport Extreme
> have problems with your connection to the Duet Controller? And for
> those of you that have a Duet and one of those two routers and no
> problems please chime in as well.
>
DIR-655 has worked flawlessly here.
+1 DIR-655 has worked 100% with Boom, Duet, Controller, SB3 and
Transporter
--
amcluesent
amcluesent's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10286
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthre
I don't have a duet, but the DIR655 has performed flawlessly for me.
--
JadeMonkee
2x squeezebox classics {1x wired, 1x wifi} | squeezecentre v7.2.1 |
readynas duo { raidiator 4.14 | 1gb hynix hymd512m646cfp8-j | 2x 1tb
samsung hd103uj } | d-link dir-655
---
I'm running SqueezeCenter on a Mac Mini (as well as on a new MacBook
Pro) and I've noticed that my Duet Controller seems to lose connection
to my network. My current router is a tiny Linksys Compact WRT54GC and
although this isn't the case, I feel that if I opened it up I'd find a
bent paperclip i
13 matches
Mail list logo
