Mark Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 09:23 +0100, Richard Elen wrote:
From: Mark Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - it would be helpful if your mailer script didn't automatically
quote peoples email addresses when replying - it makes it so much easier
for spam email harvesters..
Apologie
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 21:38 +0100, Richard Elen wrote:
> Last time I noted:
> > I don't have LAME installed, incidentally.
>
> Well, I installed LAME and restarted the server; SS said that LAME was
> "correctly installed"; and now this problem has gone away.
OK, this is very strange. Are you sur
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 09:23 +0100, Richard Elen wrote:
> > From: Mark Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT - it would be helpful if your mailer script didn't automatically
quote peoples email addresses when replying - it makes it so much easier
for spam email harvesters..
> > However, if yo
I asked:
An aside: does anyone know what happens (with an SB2 of course) if you
rip a DTS CD to FLAC (instead of WAV) and try to decode it?
Steinar Bjaerum wrote:
Take a look at
http://www6.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1297085
- Where we find the answer is yes (for both AC3 and DTS to both F
Last time I noted:
I don't have LAME installed, incidentally.
Well, I installed LAME and restarted the server; SS said that LAME was
"correctly installed"; and now this problem has gone away.
Doesn't explain why this was happening, but evidently LAME is a good
thing to have on board.
Thanks for
>
> An aside: does anyone know what happens (with an SB2 of course) if you
> rip a DTS CD to FLAC (instead of WAV) and try to decode it?
>
> Thanks for the info and the assistance!
>
> --Richard E
Take a look at
http://www6.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1297085
Steinar
___
From: Mark Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure that the concept of bit rate has very much meaning for
FLAC, other than for network bandwidth. The quality is totally
unaffected by bitrate.
This is the figure given by SSQ2 when I ask it. I know it's pretty
meaningless but included it in case it
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 23:39 +0100, Richard Elen wrote:
> Interesting little thing this, and I suppose I should be pleased I am
> getting anything at all.
You shouldn't be surprised. This functionality should be
fully working for you.
> I've encoded a couple of albums for test purposes with FLAC
Interesting little thing this, and I suppose I should be pleased I am
getting anything at all.
I've encoded a couple of albums for test purposes with FLAC at 964 kb/s,
CBR.
SoftSqueeze 2 plays them fine, as I imagine the SB2 will when it gets
here. However on my creaky old SB1, it plays (which
