[slim] I wonder why...DNLA

2010-06-04 Thread sSNICKERSs
I wonder why, Squeezebox are not DNLA compliant as other wifi radios (and cheaper one...). It would be so simple not to have to switch between mysB.com and server modes Nowdays, even TV set are DNLA compliant... Does anyone know why ? -- sSNICKERSs

Re: [slim] I wonder why...DNLA

2010-06-04 Thread andyg
DLNA is pretty limited, we can do a lot more things with our own server. That said, it is something I'd like to see us do someday, but it's not been a priority. DLNA support could be added through a plugin, I even started working on one myself, but it's a large job and I don't have the tuits to

Re: [slim] I wonder why...DNLA

2010-06-04 Thread pski
sSNICKERSs;552969 Wrote: I wonder why, Squeezebox are not DNLA compliant as other wifi radios (and cheaper one...). It would be so simple not to have to switch between mysB.com and server modes Nowdays, even TV set are DNLA compliant... Does anyone know why ? What does this do for

Re: [slim] I wonder why...DNLA

2010-06-04 Thread pippin
DLNA is much inferior and currently doesn't support most of the features that make the Squeezebox an interesting device: - (usable) remote control - synchronization - gapless playback - extensibility It's no surprise that cheap radios support it, that's what it is: an interface for cheap

Re: [slim] I wonder why...DNLA

2010-06-04 Thread dsdreamer
andyg;552973 Wrote: but it's a large job and I don't have the tuits to work on it right now. ...and the pointy-haired boss is forcing to put your round tuits into a square hole? (Don't answer that!) -- dsdreamer -- Dreamer, easy in the chair that really fits you...