Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-13 Thread livelock
JimC;207787 Wrote: > > With the new local language support, I'm not sure how much room is left > for storage in FW. It's also a bit inconsistent with the idea of the > renderer being "slim" (or server-driven). And, yes, it opens a box I'm > not sure we can or want to open. > Without having r

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-11 Thread JimC
)p(;207813 Wrote: > Why not just a simple ir-repeater option in the firmware. And very > useful for a lot of people. I know I would love ti see that happen :) > > peter Hmmm... perhaps I'm missing something, but how will that solve the problem? The request is for IR blaster plug-in functionali

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-11 Thread Michael Herger
> I can't even imagine the hit to responsiveness you'd see when mapping > remote keypresses via a server residing on the Internet. Just connect to SQN right now - you'll see it immediately (or not!). All IR commands are handled by the server already. Michael

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-11 Thread JJZolx
peterw;207848 Wrote: > I'd rather see Logitech port IRBlaster to SN if there's really much > customer demand. Keep that relatively heavy logic on the server side. I can't even imagine the hit to responsiveness you'd see when mapping remote keypresses via a server residing on the Internet. --

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-11 Thread andyg
Ted Cabeen;208208 Wrote: > JimC wrote: > > peterw;207760 Wrote: > >> ...Slimserver 7.0 will allow us to connect to SqueezeNetwork through > our > >> local Slimservers, so that third party plugins like IR Blaster will > work > >> -- as well as also allowing "direct" connections to SN as in the >

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-09 Thread peterw
)p(;207813 Wrote: > Why not just a simple ir-repeater option in the firmware. And very > useful for a lot of people. I know I would love ti see that happen :) > I'd rather see Logitech port IRBlaster to SN if there's really much customer demand. Keep that relatively heavy logic on the server si

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-09 Thread andyg
If you want to get an idea of how SN services will work via SS7, try a recent trunk build. MP3tunes and most of Rhapsody Direct are already working. -- andyg andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?useri

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-09 Thread Michael Herger
> How exactly will the Squeezebox->SlimServer->SqueezeNetwork connection SlimServer should work as kind of proxy who's requesting the information from SQN. In fact that's already the case today for most of the radio stations: when you browse eg. Shoutcast, SlimServer will fetch the list of

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread JimC
JJZolx;207769 Wrote: > How exactly will the Squeezebox->SlimServer->SqueezeNetwork connection > work and what are the advantages over just using the capabilities of > SlimServer? I thought the plans were more along the lines of having > SlimServer sync with SqueezeNetwork settings and favorites,

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread JJZolx
How exactly will the Squeezebox->SlimServer->SqueezeNetwork connection work and what are the advantages over just using the capabilities of SlimServer? I thought the plans were more along the lines of having SlimServer sync with SqueezeNetwork settings and favorites, so the SB isn't actually talk

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread JimC
peterw;207760 Wrote: > ...Slimserver 7.0 will allow us to connect to SqueezeNetwork through our > local Slimservers, so that third party plugins like IR Blaster will work > -- as well as also allowing "direct" connections to SN as in the current > model. > > -Peter Peter is correct, the current

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread peterw
Mausoleum;207752 Wrote: > I noticed that when the SqueezeBox is connected to SqueezeNetwork, the > IRBlaster plugin is not operating. Is there a way to change that? I > have the SqueezeBox turning my amp on and off, which I find quite > useful, but that doesn't work when it's connected to Squee

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread matthijskoopmans
That would mean that you would need to be upload your specific IRBlaster codes to your personal settings on the Squeezenetwork site. This would require an addition to the plugin (generating a file ready for upload, and logging on to Squeezenetwork for doing so), and an extension to the services of

Re: [slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread realityloop
I'd noticed this too.. would be great if it did work.. as I've pretty much shied away from using SqueezeNetwork due to it.. -- realityloop realityloop's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11508 View t

[slim] IRBlaster while on SqueezeNetwork

2007-06-08 Thread Mausoleum
Hello, I noticed that when the SqueezeBox is connected to SqueezeNetwork, the IRBlaster plugin is not operating. Is there a way to change that? I have the SqueezeBox turning my amp on and off, which I find quite useful, but that doesn't work when it's connected to SqueezeNetwork 8-(. Thanks, M