hi...
i had used this and its works as a winamp
iits effect are also good.
soubd clearity and fine to listen...
its really good.
--
allmywebsite1
'free internet tv' (http://www.craftytv.com/)
allmywebsite1's Profile:
I don't mind using external programs for organizing and tagging my music
(musicbrainz picard, mp3tag, foobar2000), because I like the idea of the
read-only access from Squeezecenter.
But these past days I used Amarok for a while again after many months
using only Squeezecenter, and I must say
I've been using Firetongue Software OrangeCD as a music librarian, very
happy how it scans and catalogue the files, plus you can add amounts of
additional info into it's database. The PC client app. has a good
integration to any Sqeezecenter, so you can click on any music and have
it playing from
brdbointx;310620 Wrote:
I really only have one real request for Squeeze center - I would like
for them to integrate some type of analytical system for songs that
creates playlists on the fly. On squeezenetwork, using the Mp3tunes
system allows for smart playlists (powered by AMG technology)
egd;313556 Wrote:
That'd be my audio nirvana too, I've discussed it here many times in the
past, but it would seem there's no appetite for it - probably because it
would involve customers having to pay for the AMG piece (which I'd
happily do).
Not quite true - it can be run headless as a
Nonreality;313564 Wrote:
Whats the difference, it's still running a separate program whether it's
headless or GUI. Either way adds more complexity. You're just talking
terminology. A fully intergrated system in this case would be better.
Agree a fully integrated solution would be better,
Mike New wrote:
egd;310591 Wrote:
What would you like to see it do, rattle off the features list.
Thanks for asking. Here is a quick dirty list. To see how these
might might look on the actual interface, reference iTunes,
MediaMonkey, Media Player.
1. List the library in its
2008/6/13 Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Something like Moose, I haven't
tried Moose for a while so perhaps Moose is what I'm looking for.
FWIW, Moose's offline playlist editing still isn't quite there yet.. It can
only really edit the currently playing playlist..
I do plan on adding proper offline
I'm another one of those folks who really, (and I mean -really-) don't
want any web-based app to have write access to my music collection.
Somebody manages to break in, there's no mess for me to have to clean
up.
I wouldn't mind if there was some way to add a track/album to a fix
tags later
bobkoure;311491 Wrote:
I wouldn't mind if there was some way to add a track/album to a fix
tags later to-do list. Yes, I realize I could
- open a playlist with current to-dos
- add the offending track/album
- save
... but that's way more complicated than just writing on a piece of
paper.
aubuti;310651 Wrote:
Personally, I'm extremely happy that SC doesn't manage my music my
library. Knowing that it only has read-only access to my library
(except playlists, although I could lock that down too if I wished)
means I can turn over the remote or keyboard or whatever to friends and
I'm a long-time, multiple-Squeezebox user, and will be the first to say
there is much to love about this system. But despite the power and
flexibility of the software, its poor music management continues to
frustrate me.
For example, I have a large music library, and often just hit random
play
what surprises me is that no one has taken the open source SC server,
and made it a plugin for something like winamp.
i wouldn't have the foggiest idea about how to go about that, but it
seems to me that an app like winamp could do all the user/os stuff, and
the plugin would then handle the
Mike New;310536 Wrote:
I'm a long-time, multiple-Squeezebox user, and will be For example, I
have a large music library, and often just hit random play for the
adventure of what might come next. Sometimes a particularly good tune
comes up, and I'd like to save it to a different best stuff
Whilst I understand where most are coming from in respect of SC's
limitations, I would hate to see SC try to become all things to
everyone.
IMHO SC already tries to do too much and there's possibly an argument
that its current form should be split between streaming music/ being
the go-between
Mike New;310586 Wrote:
I gotta say, I'm growing weary of constantly looking for work-arounds
and auxillary programs, especially when finishing this software seems
so achievable.
What would you like to see it do, rattle off the features list.
--
egd
Internet forums: conclusive proof depth
Nostromo;310571 Wrote:
SqueezeCenter isn't meant for music management. You're supposed to use
other software, like iTunes, for that purpose.
Really? Then what is SqueezeCenter meant for? I've always viewed
Squeeze as a dedicated music system -- no video streaming, no TV
interface -- just a
egd;310579 Wrote:
Granted, there isn't a decent library management tool out there at
present, not even iTunes comes close.
Maybe you should give Amarok a try?
So far the best and most complete music library management software
I've ever used. iTunes is just a joke compared to (and will remain
sebp;310594 Wrote:
Maybe you should give Amarok a try?
So far the best and most complete music library management software
I've ever used. iTunes is just a joke compared to (and will remain in
my mind until it opens up to FLAC and let your burn audio CD from music
you've ripped).
I've
egd;310591 Wrote:
What would you like to see it do, rattle off the features list.
Thanks for asking. Here is a quick dirty list. To see how these
might might look on the actual interface, reference iTunes,
MediaMonkey, Media Player.
1. List the library in its entirety on one screen, with
egd;310591 Wrote:
What would you like to see it do, rattle off the features list.
I really only have one real request for Squeeze center - I would like
for them to integrate some type of analytical system for songs that
creates playlists on the fly. On squeezenetwork, using the Mp3tunes
system
Mike New;310586 Wrote:
Really? Then what is SqueezeCenter meant for? I've always viewed
Squeeze as a dedicated music system -- no video streaming, no TV
interface -- just a killer system for music enthusiasts like me. Now
I'm told I should use iTunes to manage my music, and third-party
Nostromo;310640 Wrote:
Its main function is to stream your music to your Squeezebox. It does
that very, very well. In fact, its the best there is, IMO. OTOH, its
obvious it wasn't designed to manage your music collection. Otherwise,
you'd be able to tag your tracks, etc, etc. Its simply not
23 matches
Mail list logo
