RE: [slim] Maintaining a large library of WAV files - artwork, tagging, issues

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:59 +0100, Natan & Nicki Tiefenbrun wrote: > I played with MusicMatch, adding some tags (2.3 I think) to the WAV > files, but this seemed to confuse Slimserver (I guess WAVs & Tag?s > don?t mix)? > Any thoughts would be appreciated. Last time I looked into the details o

RE: [slim] Maintaining a large library of WAV files - artwork, tagging, issues

s are tagged in the existing databases, and how much time you are prepared to spend re-tagging them! HTH, Patrick -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Natan & Nicki TiefenbrunSent: 29 March 2005 12:59To: discuss@lists.slimdevic

Re: [slim] Maintaining a large library of WAV files - artwork, tagging, issues

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:59 +0100, Natan & Nicki Tiefenbrun wrote: > I played with MusicMatch, adding some tags (2.3 I think) to the WAV > files, but this seemed to confuse Slimserver (I guess WAVs & Tagʼs > donʼt mix)? > Any thoughts would be appreciated. Last time I looked into the details of th

[slim] Maintaining a large library of WAV files - artwork, tagging, issues

Hi   I’m planning to rip some 600 CDs into uncompressed WAV format for use with Slimerver, Squeezebox, Telcanto, and a high-fidelity music system.   If I rip them manually in iTunes, then at least the Artist, Track, genre tagging info is stored in the itunes database – which I can point