upstatemike;348017 Wrote:
> Sorry if you think this is overkill and I guess I am out of sync with
> the majority but here are my reasons for having so many players
Oh you certainly don't have to defend it! I'm just amazed, that's all.
:-)
I believe we may have a winner for most players...
--
I definitely am not making fun of you - that's seriously awesome. And I
agree, my SB count just grew from 1, and I find that walking around the
house with players synchronized is absolutely spectacular. Just having 2
physical plus a SoftSqueeze is amazing.
I'm just trying to imagine 14 players -
androidtopp;347995 Wrote:
> Ah, gotcha. Sorry Michael, I definitely didn't mean to imply anything
> negative there. Just musing.
>
> And, in looking at that bug..."Bell Tower?" I really need to see
> pictures of this.
Sorry if you think this is overkill and I guess I am out of sync with
the maj
Ah, gotcha. Sorry Michael, I definitely didn't mean to imply anything
negative there. Just musing.
And, in looking at that bug..."Bell Tower?" I really need to see
pictures of this.
--
androidtopp
My SB3 is the most expensive part of my stereo. So I'm not going to brag
about it.
And my SBB as
> I would not be shocked if we found that SC will only show 14 players
> becuase "no one would ever need more than 14 players!" Will this go
> down in history like Bill Gates and the 512kB of memory (or however
> much it was.)
There's no such thing as a limitation. Was simply an issue with IE
in
Yes, thank you, Mark. I'm trying to rationalize that, and even for a
super geek like me, it's hard to do.
14 SoftSqueeze instances? No, that would mean 14 computers. Maybe 14
VMs?
14 physical players? Well, that's just awesome...but overkill?
I would not be shocked if we found that SC will only
upstatemike;345298 Wrote:
> it only listed the first 14 players
You have more than 14 players? :-O
--
Mark Lanctot
Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://fo
upstatemike;345298 Wrote:
> I just pulled up the synchronize menu in Squeezecenter (SC 7.2 on Win
> XP)and noticed it only listed the first 14 players with no button to go
> to a second page. How do I get to the rest of my players when setting up
> synchronization?
Could you resize that window t
Try the OtherPlayers plugin, that doesn't have any limit that I'm aware
of (though I haven't tried it with that many!).
--
radish
radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77
View this thread: http:
mvalera;345343 Wrote:
> Filed a bug on this:
>
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
>
> Did you try a different skin like the classic one?
>
> Mike
Thanks for the suggestion. I just tried Classic and had the same
problem. I'll try a few other skins.
--
upstatemike
---
peterw;345348 Wrote:
> Sync is also accessible from the Player Settings, though the semantics
> are different. If you're using the main page & pulldown, "sync" means
> "take control of". On the player settings page, it means "play what
> that other (group of) squeezebox(es) is playing".
>
> http
Sync is also accessible from the Player Settings, though the semantics
are different. If you're using the main page & pulldown, "sync" means
"take control of". On the player settings page, it means "play what
that other (group of) squeezebox(es) is playing".
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.c
Filed a bug on this:
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=9608
Did you try a different skin like the classic one?
Mike
--
mvalera
Michael Valera
Online Communities Manager
Logitech Streaming Media Business Unit
slimdevices.com
-
I just pulled up the synchronize menu in Squeezecenter (SC 7.2 on Win
XP)and noticed it only listed the first 14 players with no button to go
to a second page. How do I get to the rest of my players when setting up
synchronization?
--
upstatemike
14 matches
Mail list logo