http://www.atheros.com/news/TPLINK.html
So I'd guess it's still an Atheros chipset.
It may have always been a TP-Link card, in fact. The layout seems a
bit different, but that may be that TP-Link re-engineered the card.
--
snarlydwarf
it's all in how you pose the question...
By making a point about embarassment, you actually create the emotive
suggestion that SD should somehow be embarassed by this.
Whether or not they changed anything is completely beside the point.
There are plenty of valid reasons to do so: vendor
dean Wrote:
In fact, last night's nightly releases a new firmware version, 36,
was updated that included some significant compatibility fixes.
Chris will be posting details on his preliminary testing on the beta
forum shortly with a call to folks who are still seeing compatibility
On Mar 29, 2006, at 11:40 AM, JJZolx wrote:
I've said it before and I'll say it again here: Slim Devices needs a
mechanism for releasing new firmware independant of SlimServer. You
have many people that have no willingness to run beta versions of the
server, yet if a new firmware might help
JJZolx Wrote:
You have many people that have no willingness to run beta versions of
the server, yet if a new firmware might help them resolve connection
issues I'm sure they'd be all for it.
Or, as is more likely the case currently, you have those who wish to
have the benefits of 6.2.2 on
