Older versions of software are here:
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/
That sounds like way too much for just the clock display. My
consumption with 6.5.1. is nowhere near that. Someone posted about a
similar problem recently and it turned out that he had a lot of RSS
feeds regularly downl
Siduhe;158945 Wrote:
> That sounds like way too much for just the clock display. My
> consumption with 6.5.1. is nowhere near that. Someone posted about a
> similar problem recently and it turned out that he had a lot of RSS
> feeds regularly downloading (for use as a screensaver). Any chance
Using tcpdump I can see one IP packet every second (of size 1330 bytes)
going to my TP and my SB3 respectively (with small ACKs going the other
way) while the devices are idling and only showing the time.
That would amount to about 80kB/min or a little more than 3MB in the
time you mention. I run
Does the clock have seconds on the display? If so it requires a display
frame very second [the display is created in the server and sent to the
player]
SB1 and SLIMP3 required an display update very second and so there is a
display frame update at that rate all the time. SB2/3/Transporter don't
I host my slimserver (V6.3.1) on a Linkstation and since it has a
network activity led on the front panel, I can see that displaying the
clock even with just HH:MM format, still sends data every second to my
SB2... As always, YMMV.
Daniel
--
dborn
--
There is still network traffic if you display HH::MM, but the packets
are small keepalives each way to confirm to the client that the server
is still there. I think they are once every 2 seconds.
--
Triode
Triode's Profil
The other thing to point out is that when using a local slimserver the
traffic for displaying the clock is entirely within the LAN - it will
cause no external (internet) traffic. The OP mentioned that internet
access was slowed, indicating external traffic, and further indicating
that there's some
Also, any UPnP servers like Rhapsody on / attached to the box that is
running Slimserver ? I can see how that might have some kind of
process running in the background which would push up download rates,
and AFAIK, that functionality was only introduced in 6.5.0.
--
Siduhe
Or port 9000 is open through the firewall and some spider found it.
Someone could either download/stream from that (wasting bandwidth), or
just a misbehaved spider could be spamming it.
--
snarlydwarf
snarlydwarf's Profil
On 12/1/06, Psychophylaxis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Siduhe;158945 Wrote:
> That sounds like way too much for just the clock display. My
> consumption with 6.5.1. is nowhere near that. Someone posted about a
> similar problem recently and it turned out that he had a lot of RSS
> feeds regular
10 matches
Mail list logo
