"Would folks be ok with...policing, censorship, legislation, judgement,
etc."
If it improves the signal/noise on this forum and thus makes it more
useful for it's intended purpose, then yes.
--
radish
radish's Profile: ht
It's a deal.
--
sgm
sgm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2218
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18018
___
Discuss mailin
Put the prefix "self-" in front of each of your loaded words, and we'll
agree! :-)
--
MrC
MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t
Ok, then I'll rephrase your request.:-)
"Would folks be ok with...policing, censorship, legislation, judgement,
etc."
--
sgm
sgm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2218
View this thread: http:/
sgm, I really think you are reading way to much "control" into my
question to the forum users. I haven't suggested or asked for any
policing, censorship, legislation, judgement, etc. I wrote "Would
folks be ok with...".
I'm asking for some community consensus on what we'd like to do, that's
all
I suspect most posters already attempt to take on the responsibility you
are seeking; however, you can't legislate morality. Some will fall off
the wagon -- even you might once or twice :).
I doubt too many folks need reminding of this etiquette; so such
requests really come down to requiring a
I was actually trying to suggest that we each take responsibility for
trying to recognize when we're tending to migrate from the posters main
point/question, and volunteer a move to a new appropriately titled
thread (perhaps in General). There are a number of lists which embrace
this ideal.
I po
I tend towards the view that, where a forum brings together a group of
people with a shared interest (as here), it's almost inevitable that
through time, some form of community will evolve and many of the
members will want to expand the scope of discussion within the
community. I think it's wise t
On 8-Nov-05, at 11:47 PM, Bruce Hartley wrote:
As long as slimdevices can spare the disc and bandwidth, what's the
harm ?
strictly as devil's advocate...
if some were to start the chatting on a forum other than the one slated
for 'useless chat', you then face the arguments between those who
I'm not so sure.
I agree that if you have an "intermission" type forum (name stolen from
Remote Central) then it will degrade to lots of political and nosense
posting. However, you don't have to go there.
On the upside, I think it increases the felling of community when
people can just chat.
It
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:30 -0800, MrC wrote:
> No loaded words meant in a harmful way. I was being playful when I
> chose the word banter as meaning good-humored, playful conversation.
>
> My thoughts were that if we could try to keep a little separation
> between the generally interesting discu
No loaded words meant in a harmful way. I was being playful when I
chose the word banter as meaning good-humored, playful conversation.
My thoughts were that if we could try to keep a little separatation
between the generally interesting discussions from the requests for
help, or architectural i
sgm Wrote:
>
> First, "Digressing"??.an immediate value judgment.
>
Not at all. Digress means to move away from the subject at hand - it
does not suggest that the topic moved to is unimportant, simply that it
is not topical. The subject at hand in this forum is the Squeezebox and
associated
MrC Wrote:
> digressing towards philosophical banter
Talk about loaded words!
First, the subtitle of this forum is: "The Kitchen Sink"
Second, "Digressing"??.an immediate value judgment.
Third, "philosophical"?.so if a conversation digresses it becomes
useless which is a synon
14 matches
Mail list logo