[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread Fifer
I tend towards the view that, where a forum brings together a group of people with a shared interest (as here), it's almost inevitable that through time, some form of community will evolve and many of the members will want to expand the scope of discussion within the community. I think it's wise

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread MrC
I was actually trying to suggest that we each take responsibility for trying to recognize when we're tending to migrate from the posters main point/question, and volunteer a move to a new appropriately titled thread (perhaps in General). There are a number of lists which embrace this ideal. I

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread sgm
I suspect most posters already attempt to take on the responsibility you are seeking; however, you can't legislate morality. Some will fall off the wagon -- even you might once or twice :). I doubt too many folks need reminding of this etiquette; so such requests really come down to requiring a

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread MrC
sgm, I really think you are reading way to much control into my question to the forum users. I haven't suggested or asked for any policing, censorship, legislation, judgement, etc. I wrote Would folks be ok with I'm asking for some community consensus on what we'd like to do, that's all.

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread sgm
Ok, then I'll rephrase your request.:-) Would folks be ok with...policing, censorship, legislation, judgement, etc. -- sgm sgm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2218 View this thread:

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread MrC
Put the prefix self- in front of each of your loaded words, and we'll agree! :-) -- MrC MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468 View this thread:

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread sgm
It's a deal. -- sgm sgm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2218 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18018 ___ Discuss

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-09 Thread radish
Would folks be ok with...policing, censorship, legislation, judgement, etc. If it improves the signal/noise on this forum and thus makes it more useful for it's intended purpose, then yes. -- radish radish's Profile:

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-08 Thread sgm
MrC Wrote: digressing towards philosophical banter Talk about loaded words! First, the subtitle of this forum is: The Kitchen Sink Second, Digressing??.an immediate value judgment. Third, philosophical?.so if a conversation digresses it becomes useless which is a synonym for

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-08 Thread radish
sgm Wrote: First, Digressing??.an immediate value judgment. Not at all. Digress means to move away from the subject at hand - it does not suggest that the topic moved to is unimportant, simply that it is not topical. The subject at hand in this forum is the Squeezebox and associated

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-08 Thread MrC
No loaded words meant in a harmful way. I was being playful when I chose the word banter as meaning good-humored, playful conversation. My thoughts were that if we could try to keep a little separatation between the generally interesting discussions from the requests for help, or architectural

Re: [slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-08 Thread Pat Farrell
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 20:30 -0800, MrC wrote: No loaded words meant in a harmful way. I was being playful when I chose the word banter as meaning good-humored, playful conversation. My thoughts were that if we could try to keep a little separation between the generally interesting

[slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-08 Thread Bruce Hartley
I'm not so sure. I agree that if you have an intermission type forum (name stolen from Remote Central) then it will degrade to lots of political and nosense posting. However, you don't have to go there. On the upside, I think it increases the felling of community when people can just chat.

Re: [slim] Re: Philosophical Banter

2005-11-08 Thread kdf
On 8-Nov-05, at 11:47 PM, Bruce Hartley wrote: As long as slimdevices can spare the disc and bandwidth, what's the harm ? strictly as devil's advocate... if some were to start the chatting on a forum other than the one slated for 'useless chat', you then face the arguments between those