It is really heating up, with recent reviews in a number of audiophile
websites. The SB2 and SB3 may help usher in a new wave of computer
audio, much the same way CD's caused a shift from LP to CD.
The IPOD deservedly gets its props for causing a revolution in audio,
but the IPOD is not a
Maybe it's just me, but I've never seen continued shortened to con't.
Surely it should be cont'd?
--
Bruce Hartley
Bruce Hartley's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33
View this thread:
That was the site that did that - I'll bring it to
their attention. Thanks.
Bruce Hartley wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I've never seen continued
shortened to con't.
Surely it should be cont'd?
--
___
Mark Lanctot
The remote doesn't use JVC codes. Slimserver just happens (by default)
to accept them. This is easy to disable (which is good, because I
happen to have a JVC tv and would rather not be mucking with TV volume
when I want to change SB volume...).
Other than that I don't see anything that stands
The remote doesn't use JVC codes. Slimserver just happens (by default)
Actually, the original SLIMP3 had a Sony universal remote that used
the JVC codes to control it. So it isn't by happenstance.
I haven't had any trouble getting either my MX-500 or Logitech
Harmony remotes to work well
How about focusing the review on SB3 instead of SB2, since SB2 is at
end-of-life?
If you don't have an SB3 contact me...
Sean
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this
kolepard Wrote:
Actually, the original SLIMP3 had a Sony universal remote that used
the JVC codes to control it. So it isn't by happenstance.
Ah, well the current one very definitely doesn't use JVC codes or my TV
would be annoying.
The correct statement then is the server by default
I like the review, and especially the enthusiasm that comes across.
There's a small typo on page 2: For example, the latest firmware upda
e added native . Missing the 't' in update.
This is nice work Mark.
--
MrC
MrC's
Sean:
I focused my review on the SB2 because that's what I
recently bought - I don't have an SB3. Also the
internal hardware and operation (with 6.2.x) are the
same.
I am sure the site would love to update the review to
the SB3. I have contacted them but I'm sure they will
agree.
I was
I was just thinking change the title, swap the first two images, and use
the new back panel photo - you call though, it's not a big deal either
way.
erratum p 2 par 4: WMA decoding not WMA lossless decoding.
(Lossless is a totally separate codec - not supported in firmware but
it is supported by
Thank you!
I think that typo likely came from the conversion to
HTML the site did. I composed it in OpenOffice.org
(for which I am also a fanboy!) and that would sure
have tripped the spellchecker.
I will probably be taking Sean and Dean's suggestion
and rewriting the review for the SB3 and
--- seanadams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
erratum p 2 par 4: WMA decoding not WMA lossless
decoding.
(Lossless is a totally separate codec - not
supported in firmware but
it is supported by server-side decoding on Windows).
I actually took it right from the Slim website.
12 matches
Mail list logo
