Jacob Potter Wrote:
> On 3/10/06, m1abrams
>
> wrote:
> > Slim does not use http to stream music to the slimdevice clients.
> And
> > I would not call http "low overhead" since it is TCP and TCP has a
> good
> > bit of overhead native to it. Slim I believe uses its own custom
> TCP
> > protoco
On 3/10/06, m1abrams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Slim does not use http to stream music to the slimdevice clients. And
> I would not call http "low overhead" since it is TCP and TCP has a good
> bit of overhead native to it. Slim I believe uses its own custom TCP
> protocol to stream music to th
rudholm Wrote:
> Oh, the original question about using SSH tunnels was from another
> poster. A responder suggested solving the problem with a VPN, so I
> offered my configuration as a working example of slimservice over VPN
> from a far-away slimserver.
>
> I've accessed my slimserver from var
MrC Wrote:
> Hmmm, remotely aren't you limited by all the downstream routers and
> final ISP? My point earlier, since your request was really about SSH
> support so that you can stream FLAC whilst on vacation, was that most
> vacation destinations (hotels, hotspots, etc.) or WLAN would have a
>
rudholm Wrote:
> That would be a pretty poor place to put a server that had to talk to
> things off the LAN.
>
> My server is in a commercial datacenter and is limited by its 100Mb/sec
> local Ethernet connection.
Hmmm, remotely aren't you limited by all the downstream routers and
final ISP? M
m1abrams Wrote:
> Well since you did not say what bandwidth the server had, I had no other
> assumption to work with. I would hazard to guess MOST slim users do not
> colo their slimserver at a datacenter with a nice fat pipe.
>
> Do you mind me asking why you do that? Does your slimserver fun
rudholm Wrote:
> That would be a pretty poor place to put a server that had to talk to
> things off the LAN.
>
> My server is in a commercial datacenter and is limited by its 100Mb/sec
> local Ethernet connection.
Well since you did not say what bandwidth the server had, I had no
other assumpti
m1abrams Wrote:
> What is the bandwidth of the connection serving the FLAC files?
>
> If it is also only 3mb/256k then I do not see how you could stream
> 900kb FLAC over it.
That would be a pretty poor place to put a server that had to talk to
things off the LAN.
My server is in a commercial
radish Wrote:
> Apologies - I didn't notice the "also" in your original post.
>
> I had assumed the server was in a colo and so had decent upstream. The
> 3mb/256k connection is in his home, thus he's using the downstream
> (3mb) to stream the FLACs.
I would be so impressed by the person who h
Thanks, All, for the suggestions.
--
elo
elo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=302
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21890
__
Apologies - I didn't notice the "also" in your original post.
I had assumed the server was in a colo and so had decent upstream. The
3mb/256k connection is in his home, thus he's using the downstream
(3mb) to stream the FLACs.
--
radish
radish Wrote:
> Why not?
>
> *this is for the benefit of the short message filter*
Because 900k is greater than 256k. On the server side the upload rate
is the limiting factor.
--
m1abrams
m1abrams's Profile: http://fo
What is the bandwidth of the connection serving the FLAC files?
If it is also only 3mb/256k then I do not see how you could stream
900kb FLAC over it.
--
m1abrams
m1abrams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.p
MrC Wrote:
> It is highly unlikely you would be able to stream flac via your internet
> connection at home to some random vacation spot, and that probability
> drops with an SSH encrypted tunnel added to the mix.
>
>
> I think you underestimate the requirements.
>
> Mr. M1abrams' suggestion is
elo Wrote:
> Any chance my SB2, in the future, be able to ssh-tunnel to my
> SlimServer... like SoftSqueeze does, but without the laptop. It would
> kinda be like my own personal SlimNetwork.
>
> Why?: Vacation. I'm not allowed to bring a laptop on vacation. In fear
> of getting any work done. B
If they do attack this I would strongly recommend they try to have some
way of storing the ssh private key in the SB. Maybe in a firmware load
or something.
However seeing as how little this feature would be used, I would not
expect to see it high on the development list.
A solution for the ori
16 matches
Mail list logo
