Re: [slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-06 Thread eq72521
usch;530579 Wrote: To me the SB2 looks slim and elegant, while the SB3 looks bulky with a lot of wasted space on the front panel. I still can't see why they had to make it vertical, but I guess that's a matter of personal taste. And the cool kids got orange SB2s, which look all retro. :)

Re: [slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-06 Thread aubuti
spedinfargo;530588 Wrote: Cool - thanks for the quick replies! I'll probably try and track down a SB2 then... Just make sure it's really an SB2. There are some sellers out there who either intentionally or accidentally try to sell SB1s as SB2s. Internally they are very different, but

Re: [slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-06 Thread peterw
spedinfargo;530588 Wrote: Cool - thanks for the quick replies! I'll probably try and track down a SB2 then... Good luck. Even SB3/Classic are harder to find nowadays, though it looks like SB Touch should be released very soon, so maybe there will be a new wave of SB2/SB3/Classic on eBay any

[slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-05 Thread spedinfargo
Was thinking about getting a Squeezebox Classic or Squeezebox 2 (preferably the 2) as a replacement for my Squeezebox Receiver. I would like the extra IR capabilities of it and also I realized that I have a better place for it that would benefit from a display. Then I realized that I don't know

Re: [slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-05 Thread snarlydwarf
spedinfargo;530575 Wrote: Was thinking about getting a Squeezebox Classic or Squeezebox 2 (preferably the 2) as a replacement for my Squeezebox Receiver. I would like the extra IR capabilities of it and also I realized that I have a better place for it that would benefit from a display.

Re: [slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-05 Thread usch
snarlydwarf;530576 Wrote: The SB2 looks like a $10 alarm clock, while the SB3 is much more classy looking. To me the SB2 looks slim and elegant, while the SB3 looks bulky with a lot of wasted space on the front panel. I still can't see why they had to make it vertical, but I guess that's a

Re: [slim] Squeezebox 2 as Squeezebox Receiver replacement - questions

2010-04-05 Thread spedinfargo
Cool - thanks for the quick replies! I'll probably try and track down a SB2 then... -- spedinfargo spedinfargo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15712 View this thread: