Karel Tromp wrote:
till I am curious how the
analoge output of the SB2 will sound related to the ones I use now
On paper, ie the DAC chip in use, the SB2 DAC should significantly
out-perform the one in the SB1. I never liked the analog outs of the SB1
and I'm expecting the one on the SB2 inde
r.htm
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
> > Elen
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:51 PM
> > To: Slim Devices Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [s
Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] What do you use behind the SB?
It looks very nice, what do you use for powering this?
Karel
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:22:27 -0500, Chris May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I hooked a SB1 to a tube pre-amp, and WOW what a difference!
>
> I was using a VAC
Elen
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:51 PM
> To: Slim Devices Discussion
> Subject: Re: [slim] What do you use behind the SB?
>
> Karel Tromp wrote:
> > ...The Apogee Mini-DAC is also
> > named as an excellent DAC for signals from CD, PC (yes) and other
> > di
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Elen
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:51 PM
To: Slim Devices Discussion
Subject: Re: [slim] What do you use behind the SB?
Karel Tromp wrote:
> ...The Apogee Mini-DAC is also
> named as an excellent D
Karel Tromp wrote:
...The Apogee Mini-DAC is also
named as an excellent DAC for signals from CD, PC (yes) and other
digital devices.
I used to work for Apogee, so I'm biased (which way?), but their stuff
is very good indeed.
They often have specials of one sort or another, at:
http://www.apogeedig
As told by several posts in this forum the DAC of the SB2 is a
significant better one than the one used in the original SB. It can be
most suprising what a seperate DAC (f.e. a behringer or an apogee) can
do with the signal from the SB1 even without upsampling it. I bought
the Behringer after I hav
Erh, eh... Perhaps I'm missing something (literally) as I go from the SB via
the phono plugs into a Krell PAM III pre-amp, Krell KSA-50 combo. As the
preamp does not have digital in, should I be thinking of getting a converter
and doing a conversion to analog outside the SB?
- John
--
No virus fou
Karel Tromp wrote:
The signal is being upsampled to 24bits/96kHz for a better resolution
of the output. The Behringer is also reclocking the signal and
cleaning it from the control-bits (CRC, copy etc.).
All together the soundstream is rinsed this way. Normally I would not
expect any difference bec
The signal is being upsampled to 24bits/96kHz for a better resolution
of the output. The Behringer is also reclocking the signal and
cleaning it from the control-bits (CRC, copy etc.).
All together the soundstream is rinsed this way. Normally I would not
expect any difference because, heh, the inp
Karel Tromp wrote:
Hello,
I am just interested what devices you all have used behind the SB1 (or
2). On this moment I use a SB1 which is connected to a Behringer
Ultramatch PRO via the digital coax which is converting the signal to
24 bits/96Khz.
What good is upconverting the signal?
BTW my Squeeze
From: Karel Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am just interested what devices you all have used behind the SB1...
Digital coax out into a Meridian G68 which upsamples to 96kHz. I used to
think upsampling was silly but learned some time ago that on the
Meridian, it isn't silly at all.
G68 feeds a
Hello,
I am just interested what devices you all have used behind the SB1 (or
2). On this moment I use a SB1 which is connected to a Behringer
Ultramatch PRO via the digital coax which is converting the signal to
24 bits/96Khz.
After that the signal enters my Marantz SR5400 OSE AV-receiver where
13 matches
Mail list logo
