Re: [slim] Re: Best Performance - recommendations? -- no, but I can tell you what *isn't* working for me..

2005-08-05 Thread Dondi Fusco
* radish shaped the electrons to say... > >Could it be file types? I'm mainly vorbis & FLAC, > with only a very few > >mp3s. I know vorbis tags are supposed to be > somewhat better designed > >than ID3, but I don't know if they're more > efficient to read. Also do > >the obvious things like making

Re: [slim] Re: Best Performance - recommendations? -- no, but I can tell you what *isn't* working for me..

2005-08-05 Thread Dondi Fusco
--- radish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I don't understand is why the scan time is > seemingly exponential. > I can do a full wipe and rescan of about 10,000 > tracks in under 15 > minutes (more like 10), so why does 7x the tracks > take 96x as long to > scan? Radish... diff OS?? Is Linux th

RE: [slim] Re: Best Performance - recommendations? -- no, but I can tell you what *isn't* working for me..

2005-08-04 Thread Matt Alioto
Maybe a .cue/.m3u problem? A lot of the CDs I have ripped have playlist files in the dir with the music. If I browse folders and play a directory containing a CD that has a playlist file in it I get 2 of each song. I commented out .cue and .m3u in types.conf to remedy.(which of course broke playl