On 02/10/2017 02:58 PM, Tufts wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Bryan Richter
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:40:52PM +0100, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
>>
>> On 09.02.2017 19:04, Bryan Richter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017
>> at 05:40:24PM +0100, Robert Martinez (mray) >
On 12/09/2016 11:00 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have taken a full-time job in Portland, so effective immediately I am
> "just another" Snowdrift volunteer. Yay! Now I can continue to help out
> the project without being a big, immediate expense for the organization
> while its cash
On 10/10/2016 08:44 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 10/08/2016 09:58 AM, Patrick 'P. J.' McDermott wrote:
>> If I may, I'm going to just jump in here with a mathematical solution
>> and a legal concern.
>>
>> On 2016-10-07 at 16:20, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> [...]
>>> If I understand right, you're just po
On 09/20/2016 08:40 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 01:04 AM, mray wrote:
>> On 20.09.2016 02:25, David Thomas wrote:
>>> What about dropping "fund"? "Crowdmatching for public goods"
>> What about dropping "for"?
>>
>> "Crowdmatching for public goods"
>> "Crowdmatching public goods"
>>
>>
On 09/19/2016 06:45 PM, William Hale wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:25:47 -0700
> David Thomas wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Aaron Wolf
>> wrote:
>>> On 09/19/2016 04:37 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>>> On 09/19/2016 01:57 PM, Aaron Wolf
On 09/19/2016 01:57 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> "Free the Commons" is a nice, short, relevant slogan. It's a call-to-action.
>
> But freeing in what sense? What commons? What are "the commons"? And
> technically, "commons" are rivalrous shared resources, not actually the
> public goods which are techni
On 08/09/2016 02:43 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 12:59 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>
>>> Also, I strongly support displaying it publicly that way "we only
>>> charge
>>> if the fee to processor is less than 10% of the total".
>> I will admit that the argument about sudden fee changes is a bit
On 08/09/2016 11:20 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>
> There are three things being discussed here, so I want to provide
> space to think about them separately.
>
>
>
> Finally, how is the minimum sensible pledge displayed: as a dollar
> amount, or as a ratio? I think it's clear that the amount shoul
On 08/09/2016 08:09 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 06:31 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>> On August 9, 2016 8:59:16 AM EDT, Bryan Richter wrote:
>>>
>>> I suggest we specify it as a maximum fee percentage, however, to help
>>> adapt to future fee differences. That being the case, I propose we
On 08/03/2016 06:19 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
> I want to propose my solution as the *final* one for MVP: The limit is
> accepted as a hard limit for any charge in any given month, because it
> makes things as easy and reliable as possible for the patrons. Whenever
> there needs to be a carry-over,
On 06/04/2016 06:56 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>
> On June 4, 2016 5:21:31 AM EDT, mray wrote:
>>
>> On 04.06.2016 08:35, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:
>>> Bryan Richter skreiv 04. juni 2016 03:47:
There are two situations where I'm not sure what the best action is.
>>> IMO, the best solution (in
On 05/18/2016 05:51 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:13:34PM -0600, Peter Harpending wrote:
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:21:23AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote:
>>> Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that.
>>> We have to make some decisions, but fir
that typically anonymity would be a strong concern for
people offering feedback to Snowdrift. The feedback form page could
potentially offer a tipbox.is link for anyone who prefers it, though?
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
30
t would like to support
it, I could opt to be 1/4 of a patron. Or if a project I use heavily
and care a lot about doesn't yet have so many patrons, or has plenty but
I still want to give it extra support, I could opt to be a double or
triple patron, etc.
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepma
!
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
<http://www.TechDesignPsych.com?id=esig> OpenPGP: 6D65A4F7
<http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?search=0x6D65A4F7&fingerprint=
This is very much a first draft to illustrate an idea, but I'm sending
it now in case it could be helpful at SCALE.
Best,
Michael
Will Snowdrift.coop be a good fit for your project DRAFT 01.odg
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.graphics
Will Snowdrift.coop be a good fit for your
list. For example, it could be a
checkbox on the volunteer interest form.
Thoughts?
Best,
Michael
--
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*^TM
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/^TM
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
<http://www.TechDesignPsych.com?id=esig>
17 matches
Mail list logo
