I may agree with you; I haven't quite decided yet. I'm going to
continue to argue until I'm convinced one way or the other.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:36 AM, mray wrote:
On 20.10.2015 19:09, Stephen Michel wrote:
!IMPORTANT!
First: I propose we set a Design Freeze Deadline
!IMPORTANT!
First: I propose we set a Design Freeze Deadline of next MONDAY, OCT 26
for the mechanism. After that date, the design shall be locked in.
---
Second: I'm going to re-pitch my proposal:
I hold these to be self-evident. If you agree with me, I don't see what
your objection might
On 10/19/2015 08:20 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> In short, I don't believe we actually need any change to the mechanism;
> we just need to lower the minimum and encourage donation at
> above-minimum levels.
>
> We should do this by keeping in mind that *the average user will tend to
> stick with
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Aaron Wolf
wrote:
On 10/19/2015 08:20 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
In short, I don't believe we actually need any change to the
mechanism;
we just need to lower the minimum and encourage donation at
above-minimum levels.
We should
On 19.10.2015 17:47, Stephen Michel wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/19/2015 08:20 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>>> In short, I don't believe we actually need any change to the mechanism;
>>> we just need to lower the minimum