This would be great for a class I have planned in "Critical Thinking".
Our grad students really lack confidence in their abilities and need to
know that if it walks like a duck, and everybody else thinks it walks
like a duck...
-peter
On 01/27/2016 9:30 AM, Jeremy Gray wrote:
Retraction
Retraction watch is a pretty good resource for this type of thing: They
have categories for "doing the right thing" -
http://retractionwatch.com/category/doing-the-right-thing/ where a
researcher corrects their own error, as well as data issues category, which
covers many of the computing errors -
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:12:22AM -0500, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Joshua Ryan Smith Ph.D.
> wrote:
> > Titus and Greg,
> > Do you have a list of these cases on the web, or is this an informal thing
> > between you two? I'd be interested in
It last made its appearance here:
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745
4th paragraph down, starting with "We believe"...
Greg probably has a list in some Google Doc that he can no longer find.
If I can find the time, maybe I'll write up a quick blog post
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Joshua Ryan Smith Ph.D.
wrote:
> Titus and Greg,
> Do you have a list of these cases on the web, or is this an informal thing
> between you two? I'd be interested in seeing the list.
I used to use the example of the Reinhardt & Rogoff
Hi all,
for many years, Greg and I and others have been collecting "mea culpas"
on research failures due to computational mistakes -- here's one that
caught my eye the other day:
http://www.unz.com/gnxp/there-was-no-vast-migration-of-eurasians-into-africa/
Reads to me like a workflow system
Titus and Greg,
Do you have a list of these cases on the web, or is this an informal thing
between you two? I'd be interested in seeing the list.
Best,
Joshua
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 09:36, C. Titus Brown wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> for many years, Greg and I and others have
Ditto about the interest on this list of cases.
I'll add that besides a workflow system which would have helped (but
not necessarily panacea, errors could be made there too), an open data
reproducible paper would have helped even more: with all those
skeptics, someone would have tried to re-run
> I'll add that besides a workflow system which would have helped (but
> not necessarily panacea, errors could be made there too), an open data
> reproducible paper would have helped even more: with all those
> skeptics, someone would have tried to re-run the analysis seeking for
> errors, and
Is this story on the list? Happened to land (again) in my Twitter feed...
https://www.thewinnower.com/papers/1052-avoid-having-to-retract-your-genomics-analysis
Lex
On 26 Jan 2016, at 17:57, Neil Chue Hong (SSI)
wrote:
>> I'll add that besides a workflow system
10 matches
Mail list logo