Thanks Greg (and anonymous statistician) for the great feedback. I used
certification year as the covariate because I didn't have much else to work
with (and I couldn't figure out how to get an overall survival function
from statsmodels).
I've added a bit to my initial analysis [1], but I'd love
Hi Byron; thanks very much for this. We threw it in front of a
statistician, and got this:
With the caveat that I'm not actually a biostatistician, I think year
is the wrong "treatment" here. You either want to
1. binarize before/after the major shift in instructor training
procedure (n
Could someone take a look at this survival analysis of the same data [1]?
I'm by no means an expert, so I'd like to know if I'm doing anything
obviously wrong.
[1]: http://bsmith89.github.io/swc-instructor-training-analysis/
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Greg Wilson <
gvwil...@software-carpen
This is simply awesome (both the stats and the results of them)! I was
convinced we were losing a lot more people than that!
karin
On 20/05/16 17:51, Greg Wilson wrote:
Following up on Wednesday's post about instructor training stats [1],
Erin Becker (Data Carpentry's new Associate Director)
Following up on Wednesday's post about instructor training stats [1],
Erin Becker (Data Carpentry's new Associate Director) has posted an
analysis at [2]. I was very surprised to discover that less than 20% of
people trained over a year ago haven't taught yet - I believed the
number to be much
