Re: [discuss] OpenOffice.org receives award.

2005-01-19 Thread Chip Dunning
Of course, getting an award from a rather poorly high end gaming magazine is not exactly in the same classification as getting an award from a magazine that matters to the people most likely to either deploy or use OOo. These type of magazines hand out awards like popcorn treats - yipee. Chip

Re: [discuss] Re: OpenOffice 2.0 Windows Installer

2005-01-19 Thread Jacob Floyd
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:40:17 +0100, Joerg Barfurth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [SNIP] Ok. I see, distributive set contains three files - .cab/.msi (with OOo itself) and two (why two, BTW?) MSI own installers (how big, BTW?). I assume one of them is for Windows NT, the other for 9x/ME. For

RE: [discuss] OpenOffice.org receives award.

2005-01-19 Thread Justin Fitzgibbon
Then they are stupid ;-) A difference of emphasis I think, if having the fastest hardware is really important to you, for games and the like then you'll want to save as much as possible on software to spend on the latest 3D accelerator or whatever. So gamers/modders could be an important

Re: [discuss] OpenOffice.org receives award.

2005-01-19 Thread Ian Lynch
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 23:30, Chad Smith wrote: All I was saying was that the attitude that a PC isn't worth using if its CPU speed is 3gig is stupid. But, less than 2 GB is kinda worthless to gamers. Don't you mean GHz? Or do you mean amount of RAM? Maybe both! (Speaking as one

Re: [discuss] OOo database

2005-01-19 Thread Robert Derman
Eddie Colon wrote: Hello, First let me wish you all a wonderful, happy new year, and I wish you lots of success.About OOo, I am inpressed with it, I have used it since ver 1.0.1 ?? I think, I'm not sure. I wanted to ask about including a database, I don't know how to use one but I