Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
Chad Smith wrote:
I don't know if I'd call it contentious. I'd call it logical. You
can actually see what it's called.
The OP explains *why* the 1.x way of doing things *sucks*. If you
*do* have a title (which some programs automagically assign without
prompt to
http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-06-02-a.html
a longer article from OASIS.
JC Helary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am thinking is it possible to strengthen the note insertion function
for a single cell to multiple cells. Any one of these multiple cells
been pointed at, a note sign appears with lines connected to all
multiple cells on the area of the screen.
Regards,
SN Chan
To anyone who is involved in programming,
I was editing a spreadsheet in Calc and went to 'Save As' to rename the file I
was working on. Everything was in English like it was supposed to be for the
English version I am using except two check boxes under the new filename box.
The descriptions
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From XML.org daily newslink:
Possible Prior Art for Microsoft XML Patent Found
Ingrid Marson, ZDNet News UK
The row over Microsoft's XML patent has taken another twist with the
discovery of an open source application on Sourceforge
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Peter Reaper wrote:
[...]
Now the EU could, as a *client*, require that all electronically submitted
reports be in an open format...
[...]
That is an excellent idea. Where would one start on that?
I can think of similar reasons to do the same in the US for NSF and NIH.
Peter Reaper wrote:
Daniel Carrera on 02.06.2005 20:56 wrote:
I can't say that I'm surprised. I'm hoping that the EU will force them
to support the OASIS OpenDocument format. It could happen.
Dream on.
[...]
Now the EU could, as a *client*, require that all electronically
submitted
Your intent is good, but since it takes a few million dollars to overturn
a dud patent yet only a few thousand to apply for one, it's possible that
just shooting down bad patents may not be a viable long term strategy. ;)
However, shooting down this one specifically, might be a way to garner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-06-02-a.html
a longer article from OASIS.
JC Helary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is more
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
Chad Smith wrote:
I don't know if I'd call it contentious. I'd call it logical. You
can actually see what it's called.
The OP explains *why* the 1.x way of doing things *sucks*. If you
*do* have a title (which some programs automagically
cono wrote:
Robin Laing wrote:
If you want a good idea of how Microsoft views Open formats, look at
their response to the idea of including OASIS filters in Word. The
details are on the OASIS web site.
http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php
Hi Robin,
Could you pls be more specific
Michael Langenes wrote:
To anyone who is involved in programming,
I was editing a spreadsheet in Calc and went to 'Save As' to rename the file I
was working on. Everything was in English like it was supposed to be for the
English version I am using except two check boxes under the new
Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
All platforms that OOo runs on (or at least the ones I know) support
long file names, so the easiest way to see the title for all document
also in OOo2.0 is making title and file name the same. ;-)
The only case where I really prefer the title
Rich wrote:
Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
All platforms that OOo runs on (or at least the ones I know) support
long file names, so the easiest way to see the title for all document
also in OOo2.0 is making title and file name the same. ;-)
The only case where I really
Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
Rich wrote:
...
if properly used it could be useful part of document management systems.
How, if you never see it?
if properly used, you do :)
it would be indexed and you could sort/search for it (as one of many fields)
--
Rich
Peter Kupfer OOo wrote:
1) What is so bad about having an option?
Of course basically nothing except possible bloat. :-)
We didn't close the issue, so it can be worked on. My current favorite
is to switch on displaying the title not as a global option, but as a
document specific one. If you
Rich wrote:
oh. i just hate when extension is not shown ;)
btw, oo.org does not show extension when opening a .doc file. is this
intentional ?
also, i managed today with m104 achieve a situation by closing/opening
doc/odt files all the time that also odt extension was not shown, so i
Mathias Bauer wrote:
All platforms that OOo runs on (or at least the ones I know) support
long file names, so the easiest way to see the title for all document
making title and file name the same. ;-)
However, if you are moving a file between comouters (by email, web, CD
etc.), non-latin
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 18:26:38 PM +0200, Mathias Bauer
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
2) What is the point of the title property if it isn't displayed?
You can use it in different places. And IMHO the title indeed is
superfluous on most operating systems because you can use long file
names. The
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 07:48:22 AM +0200, io ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Changing the CMS system where all this stuff is archived and
searched according to those filenames would cost a lot, so nobody
does it. So it may be as ugly as hell, but is not going to go away
soon.
So, unless you
20 matches
Mail list logo
