Re: [discuss] Still Immoral to Support Microsoft

2007-06-09 Thread jonathon
Alexandro Colorado wrote: > First of Dragon Is not Microsoft both are different companies. You can > write to Dragon about supporting Linux OS. Also you can pursue a company Not quite. You can write to Dragon asking why they dropped support of Linux. And then ask when they plan to reinstitute s

Re: [discuss] Still Immoral to Support Microsoft

2007-06-09 Thread John Boyle
To Alexandro Colorado: You are correct in a narrow sense on what I said in my message, but Dragon, which is owned by Nuance as is Via Voice, and Nuance is beholden to MSFT WILL never adapt it to Linux! As to the two other products you mentioned being somewhat usable in Linux, that is the proble

Re: [discuss] Still Immoral to Support Microsoft

2007-06-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:23:23 -0500, Johnny Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oh, is that true, about the Linux kernel? Then it's a wonder that it is as stable as it is, isn't it? I thought that the Linux kernel was almost 100% stolen from Unix... And this is because you read it somewh

Re: [discuss] Still Immoral to Support Microsoft

2007-06-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 10:44:29 -0500, Roger Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/7/07, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To Roger Markus: Problem is that right now with no voice dictation that works in Linux, there is not much choice for those who have arthritis or some other disability b

Re: [discuss] Still Immoral to Support Microsoft

2007-06-09 Thread Johnny Andersson
Oh, is that true, about the Linux kernel? Then it's a wonder that it is as stable as it is, isn't it? I thought that the Linux kernel was almost 100% stolen from Unix... It would be interesting to see a list of what exactly has been stolen from Microsoft... As far as I know, both Apple and Micro

Re: [discuss] Still Immoral to Support Microsoft

2007-06-09 Thread Roger Markus
On 6/7/07, John Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To Roger Markus: Problem is that right now with no voice dictation that works in Linux, there is not much choice for those who have arthritis or some other disability but to use Windows XP and Dragon Naturally Speaking or even Via Voice. :-( Good

[discuss] Langpack for 2.0.1 with 2.2?

2007-06-09 Thread Stuart Martin
I have downloaded the Punjabi langpack for a friend (on WinXP) to have a look at. Since the langpack is for 2.0.1 does that mean that I should also find and download the EN 2.0.1 for installing on her PC with the langpack, or can I use the current release of 2.2? -- Victoria concordia crescit

Re: [discuss] [moderated] open office free, it's legal for enterprise?

2007-06-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Hola Antonio OpenOffice.org es legal para uso de cualquier empresas de cualquier tamanio. Por favor ve a http://pt.openoffice.org para la comunidad portugesa. Hi Antonio, OpenOffice.org is legal to be used by companies of all sizes. Please refer to http://pt.openoffice.org to get in touch with t

[discuss] [moderated] open office free, it's legal for ente rprise?

2007-06-09 Thread Antonio Antunes
Hello, I ask for excuse in you to be to problems, but it needed to know if I can use, open office level enterprise ,without problems? I intended if the use in companies of open office is legal free? Debtor for your cooperation Best regards ANTÓNIO ANTUNES SERVIÇOS TÉC

[discuss] Re: [native-lang] PRESS RELEASE: Open source spell checking word list receives blessing from Dutch Language Union

2007-06-09 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Simon, great to hear from you. Congratulations for this huge work! This news is quite interesting. Will this have consequences on the dutch spellchecker only or on the actual localization (i.e a revised Dutch glossary) as well? Regards, Charles. --