Re: [discuss] first summary of OOoCon 2008

2008-11-09 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
On 2008-11-09, at 18:40 , Alexandro Colorado wrote: Beside the RedFlag people, how strong is the independent community of Chineese project? That's a fair question, and one whose answer will change as the new year begins. Basically, it's like in India: all over the place and not particular

Re: [discuss] first summary of OOoCon 2008

2008-11-09 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Beside the RedFlag people, how strong is the independent community of Chineese project? What's the URL where the videos will be posted? Any big development showcased during the conference? How much attention was there for ODF? compared to UOF On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Louis Suarez-Potts <

[discuss] "Try OpenOffice.org. I dare you!" a new OpenOffice.org tutorial

2008-11-09 Thread Adrian Try
Good morning OpenOffice.org family! I just wanted to briefly mention that my week-long tutorial on Ooostarts today. It's designed for people familiar with word processing, but new to OpenOffice.org. Enjoy! Adrian www.adriantry.com

[discuss] first summary of OOoCon 2008

2008-11-09 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
All, Others will write more about OOoCon 2008, and they should :-) There will also be videos and many blog accounts, including my own. But I thought I'd send in this brief summary of the 6th OOoCon, the first held in Beijing, but I hope not the last held in Asia. It was a success, at lea

Re: [discuss] OOo support on Windows ME

2008-11-09 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Reinier, Reinier Bakels wrote (7-11-2008 8:54) Some further comments: - If ME really is not supported, the installation should not crash but give a proper message saying that. Even Microsoft does that ... Would be better, yes. - Does OOo 3.0 really depend on functionality that is not in M

Re: [discuss] OOo support on Windows ME

2008-11-09 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Reinier, Reinier Bakels wrote (7-11-2008 8:54) Some further comments: - If ME really is not supported, the installation should not crash but give a proper message saying that. Even Microsoft does that ... Would be better, yes. - Does OOo 3.0 really depend on functionality that is not in M

Re: [discuss] OOo support on Windows ME

2008-11-09 Thread Michael Adams
CC: to OP > On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:54:31 +0100 > Came this utterance fomulated by Reinier Bakels to my mailbox: > > > Some further comments: > > - If ME really is not supported, the installation should not crash > > but give a proper message saying that. Even Microsoft does that ... > > Agreed.

Re: [discuss] OOo support on Windows ME

2008-11-09 Thread Michael Adams
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:54:31 +0100 Came this utterance fomulated by Reinier Bakels to my mailbox: > Some further comments: > - If ME really is not supported, the installation should not crash but > give a proper message saying that. Even Microsoft does that ... Agreed. > - Does OOo 3.0 really de