Clarke Rice wrote:
Hi Sigrid
I don't understand, why you are complaining. Have you tried the new
version of OOo? The cropping tool for images has - in my opinion -
improved a lot. I don't know how Word does the cropping (I haven't used
Word for some time now), but I think that OOo does it no
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 10:41:45 AM +, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:42 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> > On 2008-11-10, at 08:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
> >
> > > Go back a stage and I'd agree. You need strategies to enable
> > > users to become producers and education is the key.
>
I can see a logic for retaining the whole image after cropping in that
it allows the author to re-crop the image at any time. Clearly the
downside is the images are larger than the original poster wanted. It
would seem that in order to satisfy the original poster there would
need to be a
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:42 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> On 2008-11-10, at 08:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
>
> > Go back a stage and I'd agree. You need strategies to enable users to
> > become producers and education is the key.
>
> I quite agree, and that was a recurrent theme in my presentation
Hi Clarke,
Clarke Rice schrieb:
Hi Sigrid
I don't understand, why you are complaining. Have you tried the new
version of OOo? The cropping tool for images has - in my opinion -
improved a lot. I don't know how Word does the cropping (I haven't used
Word for some time now), but I think
