Re: [discuss] Re: OO.o Moving forward ...

2009-10-06 Thread Mike Scott
Robert Derman wrote: For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with something totally different, the only way we will ever get a worki

Re: [discuss] Re: OO.o Moving forward ...

2009-10-06 Thread Cor Nouws
Mike Scott wrote (6-10-2009 9:47) Robert Derman wrote: For ordinary users, the currant bug reporting system is worse than worthless! I would suspect that 95% + just give up and never try to report any bugs using it. If we don't toss it and replace it with something totally different, th

Re: [discuss] Re: OO.o Moving forward ...

2009-10-06 Thread Patrick Desaunay
Dear Cor, and Others, My feeling about the duplicate is that it would be reduced a lot if finding equivalent bugs is simplified. Moreover, voting would be easier, and thus probably help to set up priorities based on quality (user experience). At this moment, the way priority is established for

[discuss] Network problems in a MAC World

2009-10-06 Thread Mark C. Miller
The school I teach at is predominately a Mac facility. All the servers are MACs as are the general purpose computer labs. We have four special purpose labs that use PCs. A recent effort to increase use of OOo has suffered because of a problem saving files to Mac servers. Students have indivi

Re: [discuss] Re: OO.o Moving forward ...

2009-10-06 Thread Dr. R. M. Cadwell
Good Day Folks: While I do not often post I joined this list to learn and help where I could. I too agree that thee bug tracking system is untenable. Over the past three years I have attempted to report s, count 'em 6 issues, two in just the past year. At _/*NO TIME*/_ was I able to even fin