Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor

2010-01-10 Thread Anon
On 9 Jan 2010 at 14:25, Alex Nyunt wrote: > Thanks a lot, your piece of crap word processor apparently does not auto > save and it does not recover documents. As I was writing a paper for > school, your awesome program crashed, thereby losing half my work. Thank > you. I didn't really want to w

[discuss] Re: piece of crap word processor

2010-01-10 Thread Gordon
Alex Nyunt wrote: > Thanks a lot, your piece of crap word processor apparently does not auto > save and it does not recover documents. As I was writing a paper for > school, your awesome program crashed, thereby losing half my work. Thank > you. I didn't really want to write that paper anyway, a

Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor

2010-01-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 14:25:59 -0500 Alex Nyunt wrote: Hello Alex, > Thanks a lot, your piece of crap word processor apparently does not So, you didn't check for such a feature, then? Without auto-save enabled, why not simply hit the save button (or CTRL-S) every ten minutes or so? > auto save a

Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor

2010-01-10 Thread Tony Pursell
Hi All This person is not a subscribed user, so he will not see any mails just sent to the list. I have sent him a very matter-of-fact reply using an anonymous ID. I think that will tell him how silly he has been. I dont not think it helps to keep telling him that, or answering his abuse wit

Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor

2010-01-10 Thread Sean
- Original Message - From: "Tony Pursell" To: Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 10:30 AM Subject: Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor > Hi All > > This person is not a subscribed user, so he will not see any mails just > sent to the list. I have sent him a very matter-of-fact repl

[discuss] Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread Barbara Duprey
After some of the, shall we say, "heated" discussion here and on the users list, I decided to try to identify and test some assumptions. The basic one I noticed right away was that using Reply All to a message on the list would send a copy to both the originator and the list. Now, for years my

[discuss] Re: Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread Russell Butler
Barbara Duprey wrote: After some of the, shall we say, "heated" discussion here and on the users list, I decided to try to identify and test some assumptions. The basic one I noticed right away was that using Reply All to a message on the list would send a copy to both the originator and the li

Re: [discuss] Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 14:58:57 PM -0600, Barbara Duprey (b...@onr.com) wrote: > The OOo list management (ezmlm or CollabNet-- I'd love to know who > does what here) sets a Reply-To header that includes only the list > address. This precedes the original Reply-To containing whatever the > sender spe

[discuss] Re: Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2010/01/10 5:09 PM Russell Butler wrote: Barbara Duprey wrote: After some of the, shall we say, "heated" discussion here and on the users list, I decided to try to identify and test some assumptions. The basic one I noticed right away was that using Reply All to a message on the list would

Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor

2010-01-10 Thread Tony Pursell
On 10 Jan 2010 at 14:45, Sean wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Pursell" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 10:30 AM > Subject: Re: [discuss] piece of crap word processor > > > > Hi All > > > > This person is not a subscribed user, so he will not see any mails just > > se

Re: [discuss] Re: Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread Barbara Duprey
Russell Butler wrote: Barbara Duprey wrote: After some of the, shall we say, "heated" discussion here and on the users list, I decided to try to identify and test some assumptions. The basic one I noticed right away was that using Reply All to a message on the list would send a copy to both th

Re: [discuss] Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread Barbara Duprey
M. Fioretti wrote: On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 14:58:57 PM -0600, Barbara Duprey (b...@onr.com) wrote: The OOo list management (ezmlm or CollabNet-- I'd love to know who does what here) sets a Reply-To header that includes only the list address. This precedes the original Reply-To containing whatev

Re: [discuss] Behavior of Reply All

2010-01-10 Thread M. Fioretti
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 18:47:22 PM -0600, Barbara Duprey (b...@onr.com) wrote: > M. Fioretti wrote: > >... Why waste any more time over this investigation? > > For one thing, I'm learning a lot -- and collecting it in a form > that should be useful to others. I don't consider it a waste of my > time

[discuss] new topic

2010-01-10 Thread J.J. Vastiau
How do I post a new topic? Jean-Jacques VASTIAU j...@telenet.be Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. -- Oscar Wilde, Lady Windermere's Fan, 1892, Act III

Re: [discuss] new topic

2010-01-10 Thread Tomas Lanczos
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 07:54 +0100, J.J. Vastiau wrote: > How do I post a new topic? > > > Jean-Jacques VASTIAU > > j...@telenet.be You just did it! :) Good luck! Tomas > Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. > > -- Oscar Wilde, Lady Windermere's Fan, 1892, Act III > >