Re: [discuss] :SPAM: Duplicate name field in OOWriter

2005-04-18 Thread hackmiester
is a duplicate title of a field named "Item". The word in bold "Item" is visible at the same time as the gray word "Name". I hope this piece of information will be of some help. Sincerely, Miljenko -hackmiester This is a test of the Really Sucky Email Client system

Re: [discuss] Re: feature

2005-04-06 Thread hackmiester
bscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -hackmiester This is a test of the Really Sucky Email Client system. Again, this is only a test. (Outlook is the only client that will sync wi

Re: [discuss] tabs as a new feature

2005-04-05 Thread hackmiester
t such a multidoc thing would have to be extensible so we can add to it easily later on. just $.02 Jacob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -hackmiester This is a test of the

Re: [discuss] A good idea

2005-04-05 Thread hackmiester
ready? http://user-faq.openoffice.org/#FAQ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -hackmiester This is a test of the Really Sucky Email Client system. Again, this is only a test. (Outlook is t

Re: [discuss] A good idea

2005-04-05 Thread hackmiester
Yea, Redmond's got stuff like Works, but who cares about M$ anyway? :-) -hackmiester This is a test of the Really Sucky Email Client system. Again, this is only a test. (Outlook is the only client that will sync with my Palm...) - Original Message - From: "Ian Lynch" &l

Re: [discuss] Novell and OOo for slick new Novell desktop

2005-04-05 Thread hackmiester
I agree -hackmiester This is a test of the Really Sucky Email Client system. Again, this is only a test. (Outlook is the only client that will sync with my Palm...) - Original Message - From: "Ian Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:17 PM Subje

[discuss] Re: [users] StarOffice

2005-03-30 Thread hackmiester
Ah, well that's cool too. I guess that means that if I get SO then there is no learning curve? I might try that out... On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:28:39 +0100, CPHennessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 30 March 2005 16:12, hackmiester wrote: > > Is OO.o derived from St