http://www.betanews.com/article/Microsoft_Opens_Office_File_Formats/1117692086
Does this new announcement mean anything for OOo.org developers able
actually use the microsoft XML documentation to develop a 'lossless'
conversion?
e Microsoft even called the document type the Microsoft
Jamie Borg wrote:
Does this new announcement mean anything for OOo.org developers able
actually use the microsoft XML documentation to develop a 'lossless'
conversion?
Depends on the license. Never doubt Microsoft's willingness to spin the
word "open" to make it look like they're playing fai
e Microsoft even called the document type the Microsoft
"Office Open" XML format.
I expect they parse it as: "Microsoft Office" "Open XML format".
It looks like yet another strategy to confuse people into getting the
right "open office" thing from "MS Office" and put the incompatibil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expect they parse it as: "Microsoft Office" "Open XML format".
It looks like yet another strategy to confuse people into getting the
right "open office" thing from "MS Office" and put the incompatibility
blame on the others :)
That cuts both ways, and since they
This one was sent on dev:
an MS XML developer's blog:
http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/06/01/424085.aspx
JC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dnia czwartek, 2 czerwca 2005 09:01, Daniel Carrera napisał:
> Depends on the license. Never doubt Microsoft's willingness to spin the
> word "open" to make it look like they're playing fair while still
> locking out competitors. Sadly, the state of Massachusetts gave them
> some fuel to make that
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Jamie Borg wrote:
Does this new announcement mean anything for OOo.org developers able
actually use the microsoft XML documentation to develop a 'lossless'
conversion?
Depends on the license. Never doubt Microsoft's willingness to spin the
word "open" to make it look
Robin Laing wrote:
If you want a good idea of how Microsoft views Open formats, look at
their response to the idea of including OASIS filters in Word. The
details are on the OASIS web site.
http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php
Basically they don't want to support OASIS but have people u
Robin Laing wrote:
If you want a good idea of how Microsoft views Open formats, look at
their response to the idea of including OASIS filters in Word. The
details are on the OASIS web site.
http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php
Hi Robin,
Could you pls be more specific in where to fin
http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-06-02-a.html
a longer article from OASIS.
JC Helary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-06-02-a.html
a longer article from OASIS.
JC Helary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is more up-t
cono wrote:
Robin Laing wrote:
If you want a good idea of how Microsoft views Open formats, look at
their response to the idea of including OASIS filters in Word. The
details are on the OASIS web site.
http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php
Hi Robin,
Could you pls be more specific
12 matches
Mail list logo
