Andrew Brown wrote:
Well, actually, it is. People who publish intellectual property very seldom
get to keep the copyright in it. Journalists don't, for sure. Paid
developers don't.
If I were paid, that would be different.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
Andrew Brown wrote:
But then I'm a writer. I do deals with my copyrights every day and I still
can't understand how a _joint_ copyright assignment can be unacceptable.
If I give you a joint copyright over my work, you can do anything you
want with it, including things I might not like. If I am t
Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The JCA might be easier to sell if people are allowed to get started on
> simpler, self-contained components first. You could say, for example,
> that add-ons don't require the JCA, but contributions to the core do.
>
Of c
Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Whooo hoo, you get to keep the copyright for your own work.
> Now that's a selling point
>
Well, actually, it is. People who publish intellectual property very seldom
get to keep the copyright in it. Journalists don't, fo
Daniel Carrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Sounds like it. I had no idea that there were frequent releases. Where
> would I find it? Seeing frequent updates would be a good step towards
> encouraging greater community participation.
>
>
Pavel Janik's site has them