Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> He is not against OOo, he is not against Open Source, and he is by no
> means a MS plant. He is simply, honestly, and correctly, pointing out
> several shortcomings in the OOo project, and using that (or should I
> say *this*) pro
"M. Fioretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:20051211181758.GC28676
@mclink.it:
>> from your words it seems FOSS projects have the *duty* to satisfy
>> whatever need of whatever user.
>
> No, I don't think so at all, sorry for the misunderstanding. FOSS
> developers or projects do *not* have t
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 20:58 +, Andrew Brown wrote:
> I'm not a coder either. I have written some small macros that no one else
> did first. But I do think it's clear that the open source model is not
> universally applicable.
Did anyone ever think that it was? Well perhaps RMS and a few ide
