Hi!
26--2005 19:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jacob Floyd) wrote to
discuss@openoffice.org:
JF C:\Documents and Settings\Joe\My Documents\docs\ | test.sxw
JF C:\Documents and Settings\Joe\My Documents\docs\directory1\ | test.sxw
JF C:\Documents and Settings\Joe\My
Rich wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
The setting is not removed from the configuration database (obviously
because it was forgotten to do that), but it is no longer evaluated in
the code.
so in this case a feature was removed. not only a setting in options, a
feature itself.
maybe owner of issue
although i think that this issue should be reopened (these issues both
tackle different things, one is for a shortcut, other is for a
preference - and it would be better if these things would be in separate
issues), i hope that 'preference thing' won't be lost in 'shortcut issue'.
Peter Kupfer
Rich wrote:
Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Hi Peter,
...
So they arrived at the solution proposal to remove the preference in
favor of a keystroke. So far so good - no functionality was really lost.
so what exactly is the decision - to remove the setting in the options
or to remove this as a
Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Maybe this could have been avoided, if more people participated in the
specification process. Specs are announced on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED],org mailing list and anyone can review them.
I had no idea this list existed. Perhaps I will join for the future.
--
Peter Kupfer
OOo
Hi!
24--2005 21:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Kupfer) wrote to
discuss@openoffice.org:
_Change #1_
You used to be able to return to your previous editing position when you
reopened a writer document.
BTW, AFAIR, when F5 in MS Word was used to jump to previous position,
then you was may open
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:24:23 -0600, Peter Kupfer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Calc:
-
* 64K rows.
I worry that the bigger row count is going to lead to bigger file sizes,
when really, who needs 64,000 rows in one sheet?
[snip]
I don't know about rows, but I sure could use twice as
Jacob Floyd wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:24:23 -0600, Peter Kupfer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Calc:
-
* 64K rows.
I worry that the bigger row count is going to lead to bigger file sizes,
when really, who needs 64,000 rows in one sheet?
[snip]
I don't know about rows, but I sure could
On 24/01/2005, at 00:57, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Calc:
-
* 64K rows.
* Improvements to DataPilot.
Support for RTL sheets. Yippy! (the lack of this was *the* major
complaint among Hebrew/Arabic users of OOo).
---
Shoshannah Forbes
http://www.xslf.com
