Hi all,
Current discussions about ODF icons in OOo 3.2.1, let me to make my
position more clear :
1/ I think that OpenDocument Format (ODF) is more important than the
software used to edit the documents.
2/ Obviously OpenOffice.org (Project and software) support ODF very
strongly and this support
Top posted as in _this_ instance that is more appropriate.
My first reaction while still reading this proposal was the same as Noop's.
That is because I had not read the whole proposal yet.
Jean-Baptiste's proposal has great merit. My experience with files that needed
to be available for a Wi
On Thursday 15 April 2010 10:19, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Current discussions about ODF icons in OOo 3.2.1, let me to make my
> position more clear :
>
> 1/ I think that OpenDocument Format (ODF) is more important than the
> software used to edit the documents.
> 2/ Obviously OpenOf
On 04/20/2010 10:51 PM, James E. Lang wrote:
My first reaction while still reading this proposal was the same as
Noop's. That is because I had not read the whole proposal yet.
Jean-Baptiste's proposal has great merit. My experience with files that
needed to be available for a Windows user but th
On 04/21/2010 11:06 AM, Michael Adams wrote:
Groan -1 ...i don't need reasons.
Don't be so quick to dismiss the technical aspects in eagerness to use
name calling. Microsoft formats are for all practical purposes
undocumented, especially the new ones.
The new ones are very much moving targ
erybody!
Bruce Martin.
-Original Message-
From: Lars Nooden [mailto:larsnoo...@openoffice.org]
Sent: April 21, 2010 4:51 AM
To: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] OpenOffice.org and OpenDocument Format
On 04/20/2010 10:51 PM, James E. Lang wrote:
> My first reaction
