rmance penalties inherent in
> memcpy.
>
> Perhaps a vhost-user device would better suit your needs?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Eli
> >Britstein
> >Sent: Wednes
tch.org
>Subject: [ovs-discuss] IVSHMEM device performance
>
>Hi
>
>In a VM, I add a IVSHMEM device, on which the MBUFS mempool resides, and also
>rings I create.
>I saw there is a performance penalty if I use such device, instead of
>hugepages (the VM's
>hugepages). My
Hi
In a VM, I add a IVSHMEM device, on which the MBUFS mempool resides, and also
rings I create.
I saw there is a performance penalty if I use such device, instead of hugepages
(the VM's hugepages). My VM's memory is *NOT* backed with host's hugepages.
The memory behind the IVSHMEM device is a h
