Hi.
Just some thoughts around JDBCClient.
I have to say that I was a bit surprised when I saw
the implementation of JDBCClient as it is.
What I had envisioned was an implementations that used
a basic mapping from methods to SQL keywords, eg
SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE (CRUD, remember?),
Hi Kyrre,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts: I fully agree with you. We need a higher
level of mapping between JDBC database and Restlet Resources. The JDBC
connector is a first step at a lower-level.
In 1.1 we will focus on providing this higher-level of mapping where people
can manipulation
Jerome,
I saw that you had checked in a fix in SVN for the
issue I reported. The fix does not fix my problem,
however.
I believe that the finally-block should be removed
completely, and the connection closed elsewhere. It
seems to me that the pooling mechanism should keep a
lifetime of the
Jerome,
I downloaded the latest from Subversion after seeing that you made the fix and
it all works.
Thanks for the quick response!
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Louvel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 1:50 AM
To: discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Subject:
4 matches
Mail list logo
