RE: [2.0 trunk] Using get(Variant) to return representation after PUT

elios.com/> http://www.noelios.com De : tpeie...@gmail.com [mailto:tpeie...@gmail.com] De la part de Tim Peierls Envoyé : mardi 17 novembre 2009 17:29 À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org Objet : Re: [2.0 trunk] Using get(Variant) to return representation after PUT If your patch is

Re: [2.0 trunk] Using get(Variant) to return representation after PUT

If your patch is accepted, it would be nice to have the logic in the first else-clause cached (in a manner similar to that of AnnotationUtils.getAnnotationDescriptors) so that it becomes a relatively inexpensive map lookup on a Variant key. It looks odd to me to mix the annotation approach with th

[2.0 trunk] Using get(Variant) to return representation after PUT

Hello, I've just tried a short-cut to return the representation after a PUT: calling get(variant), but it doesn't work as if it was doing a direct GET. I'm not sure if it's a just a bad idea or if we should try to make it work. The test case looks like this: public MyClass extends ServerResou