]
Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 23:51
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: Restlets and JMX
Okay here are the results of my first test with JMX integration
I was able to stop the container but when I try and start it
again ...
I get an address already bound exception
So
: mercredi 18 octobre 2006 20:35
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: Restlets and JMX
Piyush Purang ppurang at gmail.com writes:
Hi,
The easiest way I see of integrating parts of restlet api is to
declare the related MBean interfaces.
The two interfaces that I see
Hi Jerome,
What about lifecycles? It is nice to be able to document lifecycle of
a restlet and container etc...
Then we can expose status through the MBeans ... and ways (operations)
to transit from one state to another.
Looks like a comprehensive list and I don't see why we can't have a
Hi Sean,
I think any component or restlet that has useful telemetry
and/or knobs is a
candidate for exposure as an MBean. The two above make sense to me.
Agreed.
Logging control is a candidate.
Actually, in beta 19, the call logging (writing a file similar to an HTTP
log) will be
Hi Pyiush,
What about lifecycles? It is nice to be able to document lifecycle of
a restlet and container etc...
This would be centralized on RestletMBean because the Restlet class has the
start(), stop(), isStarted() and isStopped() methods.
Then we can expose status through the MBeans
5 matches
Mail list logo