Hi Avi,
Sorry, but we don't maintain Restlet 1.0 anymore except within our professional
support plans... Is it possible for you to upgrade to Restlet 1.1? Maybe you
should try updating the Jetty JARs as well.
Best regards,
Jerome Louvel
--
Restlet ~ Founder and Lead developer ~ http://www.restl
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:34, Jerome Louvel wrote:
> Sorry, but we don't maintain Restlet 1.0 anymore except within our
> professional support plans... Is it possible for you to upgrade to Restlet
> 1.1? Maybe you should try updating the Jetty JARs as well.
>
Hi Jerome,
I understand about disc
Never mind, one of my co-workers figured out that I was doing it wrong.
Apparently the parameter needs to be in the Server's context *before* it is
created.
We could use better documentation for this.
--
Avi Flax » Partner » Arc90 » http://arc90.com
-
oelios Technologies ~ Co-founder ~ <http://www.noelios.com/>
http://www.noelios.com
De : Avi Flax [mailto:a...@arc90.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 1 octobre 2009 20:26
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: Trouble Setting Jetty Parameters with Restlet 1.0
Never mind, one of my co-workers figure
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 04:22, Jerome Louvel wrote:
> This looks like a bug to me. It was actually fixed in Restlet 2.0 trunk, so I
> have just ported it back to Restlet 1.1.
Ahh, that makes sense. Good news, thanks!
> Thanks for the report!
My pleasure!
--
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 04:22, Jerome Louvel wrote:
> This looks like a bug to me. It was actually fixed in Restlet 2.0 trunk, so
> I have just ported it back to Restlet 1.1. Thanks for the report!
One last thought… I don't know if I'm unique in this or not, but this
seems to me like a fairly maj
re 2009 15:43
À : discuss@restlet.tigris.org
Objet : Re: Trouble Setting Jetty Parameters with Restlet 1.0
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 04:22, Jerome Louvel wrote:
> This looks like a bug to me. It was actually fixed in Restlet 2.0 trunk, so
> I have just ported it back to Restlet 1.1. Thanks for
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 09:50, Jerome Louvel wrote:
> This only affect the Jetty connector, but this is annoying indeed. Note that
> we do fallback on the default (255) value in this case.
Thanks for taking this seriously. I actually think it's more than
annoying — 255 threads might be OK for an
8 matches
Mail list logo
