Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Query on GPS

2005-03-20 Thread David Bengtson
Hi: I'm still working on this slowly. I've selected the Maxim 2745 as the best part available that is reasonably accessible. I've ordered and received samples of the part from Maxim, and am starting to work on a block diagram, followed by a schematic. This is looking like a RX module to plug in

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Query on GPS

2005-03-20 Thread Krzysztof Kamieniecki
Please excuse the spelling errors, I'm using webmail today. Right now it looks like my software does to the demodulation and calculation of position into xyz coordinates, I'm still looking for enough raw data to be able to test the full position calculation. Major todos: -Integration with GNURad

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Query on GPS

2005-03-20 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:21:08AM -0500, David Bengtson wrote: > Hi: > > I'm still working on this slowly. I've selected the Maxim 2745 as the > best part available that is reasonably accessible. I've ordered and > received samples of the part from Maxim, and am starting to work on a > block d

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Query on GPS

2005-03-20 Thread Robert McGwier
We can do this I am sure. I thank Dave and Krys for the advance work they have been doing when not many (any?) were "listening". If we allow the FPGA to do (carrier phase/code) (acquisition/tracking ) in a joint-detection process run on the FPGA, I believe we can do a 12 channel receiver. In addi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Query on GPS

2005-03-20 Thread Robert Cicconetti
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:33:21 -, Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can do this I am sure. I thank Dave and Krys for the advance > work they have been doing when not many (any?) were "listening". > If we allow the FPGA to do (carrier phase/code) (acquisition/tracking ) > in a joint-

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A question on wfm_rcv_gui.py

2005-03-20 Thread Sachi
I still can't figure it out. Can anyone of you guys help me with it? > Hi guys > > I got a bit confused by the code for FM demodulator. > In function parseargs(), why we return freq1 - 128e6 > instead of freq1 itself? What does 128M stand for? > > Thanks > > Sachi > > > > _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Query on GPS

2005-03-20 Thread David Bengtson
My current thought's on a GPS front end is to make it GPS specific, as there are Receiver's on a chip that take care of the details' of downconversion, filtering, etc. The downside is that it's pretty single purpose, and doesn't really support anything else. In other words, no wideband front en

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A question on wfm_rcv_gui.py

2005-03-20 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:47:11PM -0800, Sachi wrote: > I still can't figure it out. Can anyone of you guys > help me with it? > > > Hi guys > > > > I got a bit confused by the code for FM demodulator. > > In function parseargs(), why we return freq1 - 128e6 > > instead of freq1 itself? What doe

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Discuss-gnuradio Digest, Vol 28, Issue 18

2005-03-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Send Discuss-gnuradio mailing list submissions to > discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A question on wfm_rcv_gui.py

2005-03-20 Thread Sachi
Thanks Eric, so the usrp accepts negative IF¡¡frequency? Sachi --- Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:47:11PM -0800, Sachi > wrote: > > I still can't figure it out. Can anyone of you > guys > > help me with it? > > > > > Hi guys > > > > > > I got a bit confuse

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] A question on wfm_rcv_gui.py

2005-03-20 Thread Matt Ettus
Quoting Sachi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Eric, so the usrp accepts negative > IF¡¡frequency? Yes ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio