Guys -
I took a first stab at an FX2 WaveData compiler, since I don't touch
Microsoft-only software (GPIFTool) with a 3.048 meter pole. This attempt
is good enough to recreate the WaveData definition in usrp1_gpif.c from
the following "source code":
-- cut here --
// GPIF Ctrl Outputs
CTL 0
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:58:17PM -0700, Jonathan Jacky wrote:
>
> I build gnuradio-core from the 2.5 tarball on Mac OS X.
>
> After make and make install completed without error messages,
> I tried make check in my gnuradio-core-2.5. (I learned here in January
> that on OS X, make install must
I build gnuradio-core from the 2.5 tarball on Mac OS X.
After make and make install completed without error messages,
I tried make check in my gnuradio-core-2.5. (I learned here in January
that on OS X, make install must precede make check).
Every one of the qa_*.py checks fails with this same tr
From: Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Deqiang chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: FSK now (really) working at 100kbit/sec
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:52:54 -0700
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:38:32PM +, Deqiang chen wrote:
> Thanks, guys!
>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:44:52PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:33:38PM -0500, LRK wrote:
> >
> > Probably a clue here somewhere.
> >
> > 'import wx' fails but 'import wxversion' works
> >
> > Then I can select the version and get a different error:
> >
>
> OK. D
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:33:38PM -0500, LRK wrote:
>
> Probably a clue here somewhere.
>
> 'import wx' fails but 'import wxversion' works
>
> Then I can select the version and get a different error:
>
OK. Does the version of python that the wxPython binary was built
against match the ver
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:41:08PM -0500, Suvda Myagmar wrote:
> From FAQ on Ettus website I understood that one doesn't need rf
> front-end to run basic experiments on USRP hardware. Is that correct
> assumption? I have usrp main board and RX, TX daughterboards. I
> thought this hw can tune int
note that I actually want to realize an eye diagram.
And the previous email is how I like to realize it.
Does anyone have others ways to realize an eye diagram?
From: "Deqiang chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: FSK now
In my limited experience with this stuff, DO NOT install multiple
versions of wxPython. Just have 2.5.
-Ilia
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 14:33 -0500, LRK wrote:
> Probably a clue here somewhere.
>
> 'import wx' fails but 'import wxversion' works
>
> Then I can select the version and get a differ
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:38:32PM +, Deqiang chen wrote:
> Thanks, guys!
> Now I have another problem about how to use split the dat stream.
> I would like to split a data stream, put it into parallel streams and
> show these streams on
> screen. Note that I would like to show these data stre
Thanks, guys!
Now I have another problem about how to use split the dat stream.
I would like to split a data stream, put it into parallel streams and show
these streams on
screen. Note that I would like to show these data streams together in a
single window.
Could any one give me a hint about how
Probably a clue here somewhere.
'import wx' fails but 'import wxversion' works
Then I can select the version and get a different error:
gr% python
Python 2.4.1 (#2, Apr 12 2005, 10:46:06)
[GCC 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728] on freebsd5
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more i
From FAQ on Ettus website I understood that one doesn't need rf
front-end to run basic experiments on USRP hardware. Is that correct
assumption? I have usrp main board and RX, TX daughterboards. I thought
this hw can tune into frequency spectrum up to 50 MHz, which means I can
listen AM radio
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:37:27PM +, Deqiang chen wrote:
> hello, Eric,
>
> I remembered there is an annoucement that FSK can work at 100kbps.
> So I dig it out and take a look at the source code for the FSK (
> fsk_rx.py) . I am a little surprised
> that there are no time recovery there.
>
Fails at work on my SUSE 9.2 install and succeeds at home on my SUSE 9.2
install.
Running python 2.3.4 at home and Python 2.4.1 at work. However, I just
installed
2.4.1 at work. I got the same error messages before today with 2.3
first in the path.
Having 2.4.1 first seems not to have helped (
Angilberto Muniz Sb wrote:
Similar situation down here in Brazil, but
after adding the softlink it complains with
"file not found..." or something similar...
Any tips on where to put some break code to help debug
the issue?
Rgrds,
Angilberto.
While I don't have any further specific information, I h
Quoting Anastasopoulos Achilleas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I hooked up an analog osciloscope on the Basic Tx daughterboard and tested
> the usrp_siggen.py. It seems to work!
>
> A couple of questions:
>
> 1) what are the units of amplitude? (the default is 16e3)
The signal into the USRP is a 16-bit
I hooked up an analog osciloscope on the Basic Tx daughterboard and tested
the usrp_siggen.py. It seems to work!
A couple of questions:
1) what are the units of amplitude? (the default is 16e3)
2) why does the amplitude change if I change the frequency?
I guess it is related to a constant mult
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 06:22:23AM -0700, Angilberto Muniz Sb wrote:
> Similar situation down here in Brazil, but
> after adding the softlink it complains with
> "file not found..." or something similar...
>
> Any tips on where to put some break code to help debug
> the issue?
>
> Rgrds,
>
> Ang
Quoting Deqiang chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hello, Eric,
>
> I remembered there is an annoucement that FSK can work at 100kbps.
> So I dig it out and take a look at the source code for the FSK ( fsk_rx.py)
> . I am a little surprised
> that there are no time recovery there. My understanding is tha
hello, Eric,
I remembered there is an annoucement that FSK can work at 100kbps.
So I dig it out and take a look at the source code for the FSK ( fsk_rx.py)
. I am a little surprised
that there are no time recovery there. My understanding is that for fsk, if
you
use noncoherent demodulation, you w
Quoting Anastasopoulos Achilleas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> As I mentioned in a previous email,
> using the "tv_wfm_rcv.py" from the latest tarballs
> I get an error when decim=250 saying
>
> usrp_standard_rx::set_decim_rate: WARNING rates > 128 result in incorrect
> gain.
Ignore that in this case,
As I mentioned in a previous email,
using the "tv_wfm_rcv.py" from the latest tarballs
I get an error when decim=250 saying
usrp_standard_rx::set_decim_rate: WARNING rates > 128 result in incorrect
gain.
Now I changed the decimation to
decim = 100
(which is a "valid" decimation rate according to
Similar situation down here in Brazil, but
after adding the softlink it complains with
"file not found..." or something similar...
Any tips on where to put some break code to help debug
the issue?
Rgrds,
Angilberto.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I fixed it by adding the following softlink:
>
Thanks for your response, Eric.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 04:05:49PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > Does anyone have an idea what's going on?
>
> Haven't seen this before.
seems to be a kernel bug in 2.6.12-rc2, where REAPURB[NDELAY] can return
NULL pointers. Greg KH's kurrent patchest on top of
25 matches
Mail list logo
