2.2 Gsps ADC:
http://www.atmel.com/dyn/corporate/view_detail.asp?FileName=AT84AS008GL_6_7.html
Costs $1100 (1000 off).
73, Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version:
hey,
thanks for the reply.
i can get dial_tone.py to work but when i run am_rcv.py for example, i
get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File C:\mikes\gnuradio\gnuradio-examples-0.4\python\usrp\am_rcv.py,
line 5, in ?
from gnuradio import usrp
File
I'm using Swig 1.3.23. I originally had 1.3.25 as per KD7LMO but I
uninstalled and reinstalled 1.3.23.
Recompiling gnuradio_swig_python.o now. I think you're right that the
problem is somewhere around that. On my machine it takes several hours for
this compile to finish? How long should it take?
I just updated from CVS and am doing buildit across the system. I'm
getting lots of reports about unknown compiler version from gcc.hpp.
So far it's just been warnings and the build process continues without
error, but it's not finished yet...
A check shows that Debian unstable is now using gcc
Followup... the gcc 4 build did fail, with a segfault in one of the
first tests it ran. I changed over to gcc-3.3 and g++-3.3 and it
completed successfully.
John
John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
I just updated from CVS and am doing buildit across the system. I'm
getting lots of reports about
After a brainstorming session at PARI, I've come up with an alternative to
either USB or GigE, with up to three times the throughput of GigE.
Ultra320 SCSI.
Pros:
1.) Standard software interface from the Linux side (libscg like used for
CD
burners);
2.) Scalable throughput with PCMCIA
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:32:06PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
The buildit script now support a --prefix argument to make it easy to
do non-standard installs.
Is there any reason buildit could not call gmake rather than make?
Apparently Linux uses gmake anyway but FreeBSD does not.
Also it
On Saturday 09 July 2005 12:58, David Carr wrote:
How many pins does Ultra320 require, is it 32x2 (differential) = 64?
The connector is a 68 pin connector, and the bus is 16 bits. By using two 68
pin connectors you can get 32 bits wide; very few host adapters are available
to do that, but
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:09:56AM -0500, LRK wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:30:12PM -0400, Clark Pope-TWC wrote:
Yep. It takes forever with 64MB of memory. That is a big file and it spends
the time swapping stuff out to disk.
I can NFS mount the directory and compile using a
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:30:12PM -0400, Clark Pope-TWC wrote:
I'm using Swig 1.3.23. I originally had 1.3.25 as per KD7LMO but I
uninstalled and reinstalled 1.3.23.
Recompiling gnuradio_swig_python.o now. I think you're right that the
problem is somewhere around that. On my machine it
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:53:55PM -0500, LRK wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:32:06PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
The buildit script now support a --prefix argument to make it easy to
do non-standard installs.
Is there any reason buildit could not call gmake rather than make?
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 11:14:55AM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
After a brainstorming session at PARI, I've come up with an alternative to
either USB or GigE, with up to three times the throughput of GigE.
Ultra320 SCSI.
Interesting idea.
Anybody have any data on the *real* performance of
I was testing and debugging the new DBS_RX trying to ascertain its
suitability for GPS
and Mode LS transponder development (AMSAT -NA, http://www.amsat.org). We
found a very small assembly error (short left on a cap on an op amp), we
made some
gain adjustments on the OP AMPS in the I/Q
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:41:17PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
Is there any reason buildit could not call gmake rather than make?
Apparently Linux uses gmake anyway but FreeBSD does not.
It should build using BSD make. If it doesn't please submit a bug
report providing details.
Hi, Matt,
Thanks a lot, now I am able to understand the FSK code
completely. Now the only remaining problem is the
program doesn't run as it should. Quite often, the
receiver can detect something while actually nothing
is there, as a result, it receives some messy data
into the file. For
In case its helpful, here's the entire output from the make install:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] swig]$ make install
if /home/base2it/gr/bin/swig -c++ -fvirtual -python
-I../../../src/lib/runtime -I../../../src/lib/general
-I../../../src/lib/filter -I../../../src/lib/io -I../../../src/lib/g72x
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 03:08:23PM -0500, LRK wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:41:17PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
Is there any reason buildit could not call gmake rather than make?
Apparently Linux uses gmake anyway but FreeBSD does not.
It should build using BSD make. If it
Recompile finally finished(~5 hours). No signs of errors anywhere yet I
still get the same error message whenever I run any of the Demos?
- Original Message -
From: Clark Pope-TWC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eric Blossom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, July 08,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 03:08:23PM -0500, LRK wrote:
Soon as I figure out the patches...
Assuming you are building from CVS, and that you have modified the
checked-out code to fix the problem, do this:
$ cvs diff -u /tmp/my-patch.patch
Then to test it out before sending it in, do a CVS
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:33:26PM -0700, Sachi wrote:
Do you have any suggestion that we can improve the
realibility of the FSK transmisstion? such as
increase the length of the synchronization bits? or
decrease the hamming distance?
The sync pattern was pulled out of a dark place. It
On Sunday 10 July 2005 07:16, Eric Blossom wrote:
Actually, I'm more interested in having a fix for the underlying
problem -- the Makefile.am's that have the non-portable feature -- than
just saying use gmake. Part of automake's job is have this work
with all makes. I've apparently let some
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:46:42PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 03:08:23PM -0500, LRK wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 12:41:17PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
Is there any reason buildit could not call gmake rather than make?
Apparently Linux uses gmake anyway but
22 matches
Mail list logo
