On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:16, Martin Dvh wrote:
> I tried it under wine.
> Didn't succeed (yet).
> I think wine has problems with the copy-protection driver/hardware tricks
> quartus tries to use.
>
> If you know how to "patch" software to remove crashing features you might
> succeed.
Could be worth
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:40, David R. Palchak wrote:
>
>>Am I right in assuming that a modified FPGA design needs to
>>be compiled using the Quartus II toolchain? I ask because
>>as near as I can tell, the only free version of the Quartus
>>II software requires a windows se
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:40, David R. Palchak wrote:
> Am I right in assuming that a modified FPGA design needs to
> be compiled using the Quartus II toolchain? I ask because
> as near as I can tell, the only free version of the Quartus
> II software requires a windows setup (which I don't have).
>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:23:57PM -0500, cswiger wrote:
> This should be simple: a 2nd basic-RX board plugged into J668
> works with a siggen, and scope w/ mux=0xf0f0f0f2, nchannels = 2
> shows adc0 and adc2 A-OK. So the hardware is working fine.
>
> But when I try to use it in my script I get a
Am I right in assuming that a modified FPGA design needs to
be compiled using the Quartus II toolchain? I ask because
as near as I can tell, the only free version of the Quartus
II software requires a windows setup (which I don't have).
Has anyone found an alternative solution?
Thanks,
David P
Thanks Eric, I got my direct interface to the USRP working and the
usrp_oscope.py and ursp_fft.py examples work. I am very glad that the
software defaults to a Basix Rx DB configuration when it finds no DB.
One item that I am trying to chase down is that when I input a square wave
at low frequ
This should be simple: a 2nd basic-RX board plugged into J668
works with a siggen, and scope w/ mux=0xf0f0f0f2, nchannels = 2
shows adc0 and adc2 A-OK. So the hardware is working fine.
But when I try to use it in my script I get a flatline:
# setup usrp
decim = 64
self.dut
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:33:13PM -0600, Jorge Chávez wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the help.
> In a non Software Radio FM transmitter we have an integrator, local
> osc, mixer, and RF filter. In this case, I can´t find the
> integrator and the RF section. why? are not necessary?.
The integrator i
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:33PM -0800, Jonathan Jacky wrote:
>
> I'm trying to understand how the USRP TX-A and TX-B outputs (on the
> Basic TX daughterboards) are generated, and how they are related to
> each other. This has been discussed here before [1] but I think that
> diagram and explan
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:19:44AM +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>
> Just a quick update on this.
> I have managed to get a basic C++ only interface to GnuRadio working.
> For my use all I needed to do was re-implement the flow_graph class
> in C++ rather than Python. This has enabled me to create a
At 01:46 PM 11/10/2005 +1030, you wrote:
Why don't you remove the 10dB attenuator? Then you wouldn't need as much
amplification.
Daniel - just tried that and, so far, works fine, better even. How does
that saying go:
"A designer knows that he has achieved perfection not when there is nothin
Eric Blossom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 02:58:36PM +0100, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the info.
I don't have an aversion to Python, we use it quite a lot. But our
current project involves production of a real-time 24/7 semi-embedded
system. It is good for ease of development,
12 matches
Mail list logo
