Hi,
I have a question about using the LFTX/RX boards to communicate at base
band frequencies. At the moment I'm using RFX2400 boards and frequency
synchronisation is always an important issue.
My question is, with the LFTX/RX boards, is the communication truly
baseband such that frequency s
Jon S. Squire. wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Eric Blossom wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:10:21PM -0400, Jon S. Squire. wrote:
>>> We want to buy a pair of USRP and transceiver daughter boards.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not respond
>>> 605-967-2870 Uttus contact number has been disconnected
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Hans Glitsch wrote:
> Please help me. I'm having a lot of trouble understanding the make
> files to build gnuradio and the makefiles I use to build my own
> gnuradio blocks. Also, swig hates me and I hate it. So far I've had
> no trouble building gnuradio and building my own b
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > (ie I am wondering if anyone has done a comparison)
>
> My Gnuradio block which does processing in 64 bit doubles runs nearly
> twice as fast under 64 bit ubuntu over 32 bit ubuntu. Hardly a good
> comparison though since you
then later call the new function with:
sm.run_radio( adc._u )
When python executes the last line it throws an exception:
"TypeError: in method 'run_radio', argument 1 of type
'usrp1_source_sptr'"
My question is, what type should the parameter be in the run_radio
function? How do I get swig
Does anyone know the latest status of this project? The homepage doesn't
reveal much.
http://acert.ir.bbn.com/projects/adroit/
Does it work with GnuRadio 3.0.4?
David
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://l
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 12:13:51PM -0700, Hans Glitsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please help me. I'm having a lot of trouble understanding the make files
> to build gnuradio and the makefiles I use to build my own gnuradio blocks.
> Also, swig hates me and I hate it. So far I've had no trouble build
Hello,
Please help me. I'm having a lot of trouble understanding the make files to
build gnuradio and the makefiles I use to build my own gnuradio blocks.
Also, swig hates me and I hate it. So far I've had no trouble building
gnuradio and building my own blocks by delicately modifying an exa
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
(ie I am wondering if anyone has done a comparison)
My Gnuradio block which does processing in 64 bit doubles runs nearly
twice as fast under 64 bit ubuntu over 32 bit ubuntu. Hardly a good
comparison though since your blocks probably don't do the same thing.
Chris
2007/7/24, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 12:36:10PM +0200, Vincenzo Pellegrini wrote:
> > thanks Trond,
> > I went your way, and actually my stream gets loaded right into the ram
> > as I wanted..:)
> > my problem is now that.. doing:
> >
> > data = fromfile("/
2007/7/25, Vincenzo Pellegrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i think my problem is that numpy's fromfile() provides this as an output
>
> [ -1.38586906e+38 +1.12948992e+32j 1.43605805e+30 -4.40817649e-09j
>8.78218944e+08 -1.98631123e-14j ..., 4.88822397e+23 +2.90330289e
> +13j
>5.91237359e-02
Just a reminder that the CCC camp starts August 8th outside of Berlin.
https://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Intro/index.php
The GNU Radio contingent will be camping in the
Wireless Village:
https://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Wireless:Village
I'm looking forward to seeing some of you there!
Eric
On 8/3/07, Zhuocheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> Here is the problem. If I receive a packet whose timestamp is out of date, I
> trash the packet. If there are packets afterwards that is a continuation of
> the first packet, I should trash those as well despite the fact that the
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > It would probably be a fairly marginal difference though..
> > (Right? I haven't done any tests..)
>
> Twice as many registers available for the compiler in 64-bit mode.
> This makes a big difference, since the X86 architecture is register
> starved.
Yes
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:38:58AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> > I was afraid of that. It looks like I will be reinstalling my distro
> > :)
>
> It would probably be a fairly marginal difference though..
> (Right? I haven't done any tests..)
Twic
15 matches
Mail list logo
