We are experimenting with using the git version control system for the
GNU Radio project. Git is a distributed VCS originally written by
Linus Torvalds and is now used by the Linux kernel development
community and many other open source projects. Rather than go into
advocacy here, just Google to
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Michael Dickens wrote:
> For those of you running GNU Radio on OSX using MacPorts, the good news is
> that MacPorts once again supports the correct version of LIBUSB (legacy,
> 0.1.12) for the USRP component, via the port 'libusb-legacy' -- and so once
> again MacPor
Hi everybody,
I'm using the ofdm_benchmark, and I have changed some parts after
make_packet in the ofdm_packet_utils. I have problems with the deteccion of
the packets in the receiver.
How the antenna of the USRP detects the sent packets? For example, if
packages are sent in the 2.4 GHz band, int
> Ali Siddiqi wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Did the flowgraph of the code (in which you added the timeout)
involved
> > receive_path???
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ali
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Dan Rosenqvist
wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Umair Nasir wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Th
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 07:35:19PM -0500, L. Van Warren wrote:
> We have a chance to make history, with an array of GPS disciplined SDR's -
> GPSDR's for short
>
> This is the ham radio equivalent of HTML - a "lingua franca" for RF data
> exchange.
>
> Enabling radio amateurs to share signals + t
I am working on a project for long distance transmission using GNU radio. I
am just wondering if there is any supplement hardware for USRP2 to achieve
high power transmission (100W). Please help me.
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.o
For those of you running GNU Radio on OSX using MacPorts, the good
news is that MacPorts once again supports the correct version of
LIBUSB (legacy, 0.1.12) for the USRP component, via the port 'libusb-
legacy' -- and so once again MacPorts can be used for all background
dependencies. - MLD
Ali Siddiqi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Did the flowgraph of the code (in which you added the timeout) involved
> receive_path???
>
> Regards,
> Ali
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Dan Rosenqvist wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Umair Nasir wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This question is asked a number o
Hi,
Did the flowgraph of the code (in which you added the timeout) involved
receive_path???
Regards,
Ali
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Dan Rosenqvist wrote:
>
>
>
> Umair Nasir wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This question is asked a number of times. And I believe it shouldn't be
> > that
> >
