Update:
I moved the reconfiguration one level up, to transmit_path.py and it
works for high interpolation values (low bit rate), but still hangs
for the low ones.
I'm quite puzzled now, it seems that lock() - unlock() gets stuck when
there's too much flow going on.
cheers,
Veljko
2010/2/14 Ve
Hello all,
I have been spending a considerable amount of time to modify the how-
to-write-a-block to compile and make my own, different name, module.
While changing the code withing the howto_square_ff.cc is a simple
solution, it is unfulfilling.
Sadly, I think I tried to make big changes
I was able to place and route the design on ISE 11.4 using a 'high' effort
and ensuring that the speed grade selected is -5 (that really made a
difference of about 20MHz in the speed of the final design). However, when
it comes time to generate the bitstream, it complains about the -g
Match_cycle:A
Hi Affan,
Why kind of problems have you been having? I did quite a bit of
productive work with version 3.2.2 simply by creating a new set of
"how_to" routines in addition to the examples.
Are you having compile problems? Run-time problems? I remember
having lots of run-time difficulties becaus
Tracey-
> I was able to place and route the design on ISE 11.4 using a 'high' effort
> and ensuring that the speed grade selected is -5 (that really made a
> difference of about 20MHz in the speed of the final design). However, when
> it comes time to generate the bitstream, it complains about the
Hi all,
I tried this the following on three machines with Gigabit interfaces, and
got the same results:
When I restrict the ethernet card to only advertise 1Gbps connections
(ethtool -s eth0 advertise 0x020 or ox010), the link stays down. Therefore,
each find_usprs call is not even sending any pa
Tom,
most of my problems have to do with compilation i.e. my new block
doesnt compile as somewhere there is a reference to the old how_to
module structure. I didnt add any errors since I think I had attempted
a very large change in one go (i.e. changed the code and module name
and pared do
Nope, Nope, and Nope. I was rather shocked, things never go that well for me
:)
I pulled the u2_rev3 and just resolved my way through the source tree. I was
not expecting it to generate cleanly. I did regenerate two cores as part of
the process, dumped a couple of the generated .v files because th
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't recall having any problems
using the "howto" with 3.2.2. I understand your frustrations however.
:-)
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Affan Syed wrote:
> Tom,
> most of my problems have to do with compilation i.e. my new block doesnt
> compile as somewher
Hi Affan - Since you modified the how-to stuff to meet your needs,
it'll be difficult for any of us to provide definitive assistance
without seeing your code (I, personally, have very little free time
this week until I get a presentation finished). That said, if you do
succeed & come up wi
Hi All
Does anybody have information on what the receiver sensitivity or noise
floor is for the XCVR2450 boards with a USRP2. I need to know at what
level a spurious signal from another source could cause noticeable
interference to a desired signal.
Regards
Ian.
___
Hi;
Sorry again but link is not working. I am unable to download it. Is it
problem because of your ADSL ?
You have a web site but may be openning project in Sourceforge.net can be
usesful.
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 04:29 PM, yerebakan wrote
12 matches
Mail list logo