Hello All,
I already sent this email twice over weekend, I am not sure if its getting
delivered. Apologies if I spam the list/your inbox.
I am Shashank, one of the GSoC students this year. My project proposal was
to work on IEEE 802.11 receiver developed by Bastian Bloessl at University
of
I think this should be the last question in this thread. Which input signal
levels should I stick? OIP3 at the first LNA MGA-62563 is 23 dBm. Since the
gain is arround 22 dB, is it ok to stay below -20dBm?
Best,
Nemanja
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote:
On 07/15/2013 08:55 AM, Nemanja Savic wrote:
I think this should be the last question in this thread. Which input
signal levels should I stick? OIP3 at the first LNA MGA-62563 is 23
dBm. Since the gain is arround 22 dB, is it ok to stay below -20dBm?
Best,
Nemanja
Yes, signals below -20dBm
One of my OOT blocks is a function that takes in shorts and outputs shorts
(a 1-to-2 interpolator).
I have a simple flowgraph created in GRC: File Source - My block - File
sync .
GRC is happy until I run the flowgraph, and I get this:
Executing: /top_block.py
Traceback (most
Hello everyone,
I've been having the same issue with the scheduler for the past 2 months or
so and I'm starting to unravel what I believe is occurring. Let me describe
my flowgraph first, then describe what's happening when I run the flow
graph, and then describe some REALLY interesting things
Hi everyone,
I have a question about benchmark decoding. I'm using bpsk mod and demod.
In order to understand what's happening in the demodulation process, I added a
file sink after time_recov block and after unpack block respectively. According
to my understanding, the receiver block does the
One of my OOT blocks is a function that takes in shorts and outputs shorts
(a 1-to-2 interpolator).
I have a simple flowgraph created in GRC: File Source - My block - File
sync .
GRC is happy until I run the flowgraph, and I get this:
Executing: /top_block.py
Traceback (most
Hi Josh,
Thanks for the quick work on this. Setting max noutputitems from grc works fine
now.
--
Regards, Devin
- Reply message -
From: Josh Blum j...@joshknows.com
To: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
Cc: devin.butterfi...@gmail.com
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Does GRAS support setting max
Hi,
I'm using gras for my application and my custom block needs to be able to do a
blocking read to get data from an external source. With the standard scheduler
I used a non blocking read in a polling loop with an interruptable sleep and
this worked Ok. Do I need to do it this way with gras
On 07/15/2013 05:43 PM, devin.butterfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm using gras for my application and my custom block needs to be
able to do a blocking read to get data from an external source. With
the standard scheduler I used a non blocking read in a polling loop
with an interruptable
I would be also happy if somebody would answer you, but from my past
experience, nobody talks much about clock recovery MM, and I am quite sure
that setting up values are not well explained.
Nemanja
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Niaz Ahmed niaz.ah...@nu.edu.pk wrote:
Hi all,
I am
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Perper per...@o2.pl wrote:
I was reading the c++ code of FM demodulators in gnuradio and I
encountered this in fmdet_cf_impl.cc:109:
-
Sdot = d_scl * (-S0+d_8*S1-d_8*S1+S4);
-
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Andrew Davis glneolistm...@gmail.comwrote:
I have been working on getting gr-atsc running again, I have found a few
speedups and some bugs that prevented ATSC decoding from working with new
versions of GNURadio. I have put these fixes into a branch that can
Sure:
- first the description is correct and not just copied from interp_short.py
- removed the writing to 'atsc_complex.data' as this uses a lot of space
and seems to have no meaning outside of debugging
- I use interleave_short_to_complex instead of s2s - s2f - f2c chain
- lp_coeffs and
On 07/15/2013 07:01 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
After this stuff and the reorganization a simple diff would not have
saved much, also i'm working on 'atsc_tx.py',so 'all_atsc.py' would
be confusing, hence the name change.
First, let me say that I'm very happy this code is getting some
attention.
15 matches
Mail list logo
